AspectG++ ?

2011-02-18 Thread David Lanzendörfer
Hello Folks You certainly know about aspect orientated programming. http://www.aspectc.org/ Is there any chance that this will ever be integrated into official gcc? Would be cool to define aspect because it would make your code much smaller and more readable. Additionally it comes in very handy if

AspectG++ ?

2011-02-18 Thread David Lanzendörfer
Hello Folks You certainly know about aspect orientated programming. http://www.aspectc.org/ Is there any chance that this will ever be integrated into official gcc? Would be cool to define aspect because it would make your code much smaller and more readable. Additionally it comes in very handy if

Re: AspectG++ ?

2011-02-18 Thread David Lanzendörfer
>The following is just my opinion and others may disagree, but I don't >think it's a good idea because I think that the costs would greatly >outweigh the benefits. As long as it supports the development of a productive and informative conversation, I'm glad about any kind of opinion. >OK, let's as

Re: AspectG++ ?

2011-02-18 Thread David Lanzendörfer
>And non-standard extensions are generally not acceptable. Well, I think as soon as people begin to use it, even gcc itself might become more and more aspect orientated (at the c-parts). It's one of the aspects of AOP that sourcecode will be stripped down enormous, because generalization is much e