2016-04-18 10:33 GMT+01:00 Richard Biener :
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2016-04-10 3:34 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>> On 07/04/16 09:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>>> 2016-04-07 0:49 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>>&g
You are probably looking for:
-static-libgcc
-static-libstdc++
Cheers,
David
2015-02-04 18:06 GMT+00:00 Umesh Kalappa :
> Hi All,
>
> Was configured and build gcc 4.8.3 for windows on linux using mingw .
>
> configure options as
>
> ../../src45x/gcc/configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i68
Hello,
I'm writing a simple gcc backend and I'm experiencing a weird thing
regarding address legitimation process. Two scenarios:
If I only allow addresses to be either a register or symbols my gcc
works. To do so I add the restrictions into the
TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P macro. This makes gcc t
regsiters themselves.
This is because any reg is OK for base reg. I'm pretty sure I'm
behaving similarly to arm, cris or x86 backends.
Thanks,
David
2014-03-14 13:11 GMT+01:00 Julian Brown :
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:52:35 +0100
> David Guillen wrote:
>
>> If I allow als
the address to be in
a register.
Any ideas?
And, anyone can give me a hint on how to debug this issues? I'd like
to discover where in the gcc source this memory RTX expression is
created and why it is not expanded to be a valid address.
Thanks a lot!
David
2014-03-14 18:56 GMT+01:00 DJ Del
Yep thanks,
As you guys pointed the problem was the improper handling of the
strict_p parameter.
Thanks!
2014-03-18 20:13 GMT+01:00 Richard Sandiford :
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> What DJ meant below was that you should reject all pseudo registers
>> if strict_p. I.e. REG_P (foo) should be:
Hello!
As I stated on other emails I'm writing a backend. I'm facing a
problem regarding register modes.
The thing is: I don't know how to handle non-SI modes. I've read many
backends for different arches but I don't really get it, sorry.
In my case I've started with a x86 backend. This arch has
Hello guys,
I don't know whether this is the best place to ask for this, but
anyway, here we go:
I have two different commandlines for collect2 (I got them after using
-v in gcc) and I found out that the original one does not work because
of the position in the parameter list.
Error:
/home/davi
ER "/lib/ld-linux.so.2"
#define GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKE
#define SUBTARGET_EXTRA_SPECS \
{ "link_emulation", GNU_USER_LINK_EMULATION },\
{ "dynamic_linker", GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER }
Any ideas?
Thank you!
2014-04-03 1:17 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wak
Can you check whether crt1.o and crt1.o exist? And the path where they do live.
Also it would be interesting to know the exact commandline (check config.log).
2014-04-08 14:13 GMT+02:00 Mo Jia :
> Try to make a gcc cross compiler ,
>
> 0 perpare vars in env
>
> export HOST=x86_64-pc-linux
Hello,
I completely agree with David.
Note that your results will greatly vary depending on the machine you
run the tests on. Performance on such tests it is very
machine-dependant, so the conclusion cannot be generalized.
David
2014-04-16 16:49 GMT+02:00 David Brown :
>
> Hi,
>
> You cannot lea
Hello there!
I'm trying to add some vector registers to a MIPS arch (32 bit). This
arch has 32 x 128 bit registers that can essentially be seen as V4SF.
So far I'm using this test:
volatile float foo __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
volatile float bar __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
int m
On 04/04/16 10:55, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2016-04-02 3:32 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>> Hello there!
>>
>> I'm trying to add some vector registers to a MIPS arch (32 bit). This
>> arch has 32 x 128 bit registers that can essentially be seen as V4S
On 05/04/16 09:13, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2016-04-05 1:59 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>
>>
>> On 04/04/16 10:55, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>> 2016-04-02 3:32 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>>> Hello there!
>>>>
>>>> I
On 06/04/16 10:44, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2016-04-06 1:50 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>
>> Thanks again Ilya,
>>
>> That seems to help to solve the problem. Now I'm facing another issue.
>> It seems the tree-vec-generic pass is promoting my vector oper
On 07/04/16 09:09, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2016-04-07 0:49 GMT+03:00 David Guillen Fandos :
>>
>> Thanks a lot Ilya!
>>
>> I managed to get it working. There were some bugs regarding register
>> allocation that ended up promoting the class to be BLKmode instead of
Hi all,
I just noticed that 4.9 generates some code overhead for 386 machines
respect to 4.8.
In my test case I used 4.8.1 and 4.9.1 and realized that when compiling
with "-Os -fno-exceptions -fno-align-functions -fomit-frame-pointer"
certain things change:
On 4.9 the backend adds some "nop"
Hello!
I have the following function
std::tuple getRawIdx(uint16_t tidx) {
return std::make_tuple(localidx.entries[tidx].indx_ptr,
localidx.entries[tidx].indx_size);
}
Where s is a struct like
typedef struct __attribute__((packed)) {
uint32_t indx_ptr;
uint8_t indx_size;
} _i_
18 matches
Mail list logo