>I noticed that the automake maintainers accepted your patch for
> fixing the multilib issues in automake. However they also seemed to
> indicate that there would be no more 1.9.x automake releases.
>Is the r117741 svn checkin related to this issue? I ask because it
> was unclear to me how
> I am not sure to understand what is the *reliable* way to regenerate
> GCC configure files from the real (human typed) master source files
> (like Makefile.in, gcc/configure.ac, Makefile.tpl, etc...)
>
> I made some suggestions on the Wiki
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
>
>
>
> > > I made some suggestions on the Wiki
> > >
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> > >
> > > Again, feel free to edit the above page (and/or incorporate parts of
> > > it into the documentation).
Looks like it was relocated to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configur
Hi,
> > My question is: how to build gcc bootstrap with distcc correctly.
>
> I believe it is impossible in the general case. bootstrap means to
> compile GCC source code with a GCC compiler just built from the same
> source code. Hence, to distribute this compilation with distcc, you'll
> need
Reported (and confirmed) here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=29879
> SVN revision: 118945
> Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> /home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./g
> cc/ -B/home/daniel/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-svn//i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
> -B/ho
> > There might be a subtle issue with ccache assuming that the compiler
> > that created a cache-hit object did not change. I'm only aware of
> > ccache verifying compiler versions (string compare) in the
> > hit-check, which alone doesn't suffice to guarantee that the cache
> > is (or should be)
ld initialize the pointer table with it's implementation for
> the base class pure virtual function before the base class constructor
> call to the pure virtual function?
>
> Is this behaviour a cause of the C++ standard or is it specific to GCC?
David Fang
Computer Systems Laborato
> > > > Are 4.0 snapshots still necessary? I suspect they should be
> > > > discontinued.
> > >
> > > 4.0 still seems to be regarded as an active branch.
> > >
> > > I don't mind closing it, myself. Does anybody think we should have a
> > > 4.0.4 release?
> >
> > I'd like to see it closed. W
> > > I think it's worth raising the minimum required version from 2.5.4 to
> > > 2.5.31.
> >
> > I want to point out that Fedora Core 5 appears to still ship flex
> > 2.5.4. At least, that is what flex --version reports. (I didn't
> > bother to check this before.) I think we need a very strong
e dwarf2 support is too immature in the Xcode for darwin8 to
safely do that.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
he missing files to the PPL 0.11 release directory.
Please let us know if you have further problems.
Cheers,
Roberto
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
e
keeping it meaningful?
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
x27;m particularly interested in a darwin port, but would benefit from
having it work on any modern platform.)
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
--host=powerpc-apple-darwin8
--target=powerpc-apple-darwin8
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370)
Apple Computer, Inc. version cctools-622.9~2, GNU assembler version 1.38
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
=11764
Still accepts-invalid with g++-4.3.2.
compiles with out errors in g++. The result is as if f is declared with
F f;
This is the case with the stock/latest GCC in Debian GNU/Linux x86_64
(v.4.1.2) and in Cygwin (v.3.4.4).
Is this the intended behavior?
No. :)
Fang
David Fang
CC that
already does something "similar" in say one of the optimisation passes
so i can get a look at how to get started on this?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
of the base that are private, and thus inaccessible to any derived
classes.
In your thing::thing ctor:
"xo(y)" initializes the member *reference* (essentially taking the address
of y), whereas "xo = y;" is assigning the *object* referenced by 'ox',
which is not the
es, including ios_base. This is more an issue of mis-using the
standard ostream class.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
++ changes came from 3.4 and 4.0.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
.
Also, the end of the generated script attempts to move a bunch of files in
the test area, so if you ship the script to another machine, you can skip
that part.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
C++ for non-libstdc++ libraries and data structures?
iostreams, for example, uses multiple inheritance (even multiple virtual
inheritance), should that be sufficient grounds for forbidding use of
iostreams?
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
Richard.
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
gctest
===
1 of 1 tests failed
===
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/local/install/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/boehm-gc'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/local/install/gcc/i
ever manifested in any of
the official releases, 4.0.0 through 4.0.2 --- it is senseless to report
it against a prerelease.
SUSE 10.0 developers might want to be aware of this if they are
only using 4.0.2 (20050901 prerelease).
David Fang
nd it too.
I used to find Zarro Boogs, until I remembered to search for
"ALL term_to_search_for". The keyword 'ALL' is kind of important.
David Fang
Hi,
Didn't see a reply yet, so I'll chime in.
The relevant text appears in gcc-3.4's release notes:
"When binding an rvalue of class type to a reference, the copy constructor
of the class must be accessible."
PR 12226 seems to be the mother bug related to this (many dupes).
Fang
> foo.c
Hi,
Since 3.4, (template-)dependent lookup has been changed to conform
to the standard. In particular, from http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html:
"In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members
of a dependent base."
This allows lookups to be bound at template
Hi,
I tried to add myself to the CC list of a PR (27397), but get the
following error message:
"You tried to change the Keywords field from ice-on-invalid-code,
error-recovery, monitored to error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code,
monitored, but only the assignee or reporter of the bug, or a s
> > Bradley Lucier writes:
> Brad> 4.2 hasn't bootstrapped on powerpc-apple-darwin G5 machine for a very
> Brad> long time. I'm seeing the same problem as
> Brad> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27121
> Brad> It would be nice if this were remedied. I do try to test gcc
> Brad> ver
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:21 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > i386-unknown-freebsd
>
> The last time a freebsd testresult was sent to the list from the
> mainline was in May, maybe that is a sign that we should downgrade it to
> secondary from primary.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
I've got an i38
ache-hitting in
stage 2. I've done this with clang manual bootstraps, for example.
Fang
--
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
Quoting David Fang :
Apart from parallelism, I wished the stage 2,3 compilations had a hook
for ccache-ing
Even better would be distcc, i.e. distribute the new compilers
around a cluster so you don't need to have all your cores and DIMMS
on the same motherboard to harness hugely ma
is call in email afterward, so that
mechanism will also be available to lurkers.
Is there a chance of any sort of streaming audio broadcast instead of
having to dial in?
Fang
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cor
> > Dozens, literally, just browse the bug database. If you want to help, pick
> > one of them and try to fix it.
> >
> How?
> I can not browse http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ because has not the
> 'browse' button.
Ah, the joys of bugzilla.
For 4.1 issues, you can go to GCC's front page and under P
e always intended to hack the bugger (in the always
> bandied about GNU tradition) if I must. It bothers me though to think that
> no one has charted this territory before.
David Fang
Computer Systems Laboratory
Electrical & Computer Engineering
Cornell University
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
-- (2400 baud? Netscape 3.0?? lynx??? No problem!)
> On 6/16/07, michael.a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As for "placement new", from what I can find, it is unsafe to use with any
> > memory that isn't part of the heap.
> Huh? It can be used with stack variables, we have tests in the
> testsuite where we use it with such.
>
> > As for the
I still think that is too strong a position. A good fraction
of compiler time is spent bugging out user code.. one could
even say the job of a compiler is not generating machine code,
but telling programmers they're idiots :)
Every compiler version I've tried has been telling me this for years.
rejected your example on your
error-marked lines for a long time)
Try the following for kicks:
typedef signed int sint;
typedef unsigned intuint;
typedef const int cint;
typedef const sint csint;
typedef const uint cuint;
and replace them where you use ctor style ini
38 matches
Mail list logo
