Re: bootstrap error on ppc64

> Revital1 Eres writes: Revital> I get the following error while running make BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2' bootstrap Revital> on ppc64 with --enable-checking on r128689: Revital> ../../../../gcc/libstdc++-v3/src/system_error.cc -o system_error.o >> /dev/null 2>&1 Revital> make[4]: *** [system_error.l

Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.

Please keep the discussion on a technical level and not about someone's fluency with the English language. Gracias, David

Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.

> J C Pizarro writes: JC> In the future, GCC will no be the best compiler, the best compiler JC> could be a powerful compiler with inferences's machines, learning JC> machines, logic machines, etc where the men don't think in the JC> specific algorithms. There are a few research effor

Re: license for libgcc source files

> Ben Elliston writes: Ben> I see that the source files compiled into libgcc are still licensed Ben> under GPLv2+exception and that these have not yet been converted to Ben> GPLv3 of any description. Ben> What is the status of this? Is it okay to submit new source files (to Ben> be compiled

Re: license for libgcc source files

> Ben Elliston writes: Ben> What should be done with the license of new source files in the Ben> meantime? New source files that require exception language should use the current license and exception language present in other files. Thanks, David

Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?

> Dave Korn writes: Dave> I don't understand: why wouldn't designing it so that they have to be Dave> implemented as DSOs and hence are covered by the Dave> anything-directly-linked-in-is-GPL'd clause do the job? Or is the concern Dave> that people will write trivial marshalling plugins and s

Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?

If you want to have a legal discussion, please take this conversation somewhere else. Thanks, David

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC

> Mark Mitchell writes: Mark> I think we all agree that providing better debugging of optimized code Mark> is a priori a good thing. So, as I see it, this thread is focused on Mark> what internal representation we might use for that. Yes, it is a good thing, but not at any price. Re

Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files

> Diego Novillo writes: Diego> I'm not sure if it's intended, but I don't think it's desirable. The Diego> information needed to do LTO optimizations should be independent from Diego> the debugging information. Diego> We could have a --strip-lto option for strip, but I don't think Diego>

Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?

> Andrew Haley writes: >> I have a different fear: that gcc will become increasing >> irrelevant, as more and more new programmers learn to work on >> alternative free compilers instead. That is neutral with regard to >> freedom, but it will tend to lose the many years of experience >> which

Re: Limits of stage3 changes

> Kaveh R GHAZI writes: Kaveh> I think the answer is "maybe". In the past we have counted compile-time Kaveh> savings as appropriate for stage3 regression fixes. However IMHO you Kaveh> would need to provide some measurement of the improvements (memory saved, Kaveh> speed timings) so the RM

Re: performance of exception handling

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:47 AM Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > My current preferred solution is something that moves the entire code > that locates the relevant FDE table into glibc. This is all the code in > _Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback until the first read_encoded_value_with_base > call. And

Re: performance of exception handling

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:52 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * David Edelsohn: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:47 AM Florian Weimer via Gcc > > wrote: > > > >> My current preferred solution is something that moves the entire code > >> that locates th

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:00 PM Rob Savoye wrote: > > On 5/14/20 8:08 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > >> stops responding for whatever reason. I have come up with a solution > >> (that I'd be happy to upstream, except that DejaGNU maintenance seems to > >> have been dead for like a year now), which I

GCC multilib build machinery for AIX 64 bit configuration

TL;DR: How to preserve multilibs directory hierarchy for GCC 64 bit configuration on AIX when 32 bit multilib exists in the top-level directory, no explicit MULTILIB_DIRNAME. Currently the powerpc-ibm-aix* port supports a 64-bit explicit multilib and a 32 bit implicit, default multilib in the top-

GCC Testsuite patches break AIX

Alexandre, Your testsuite patches have completely broken the testsuite on AIX. 1000's of testsuite failures because the testsuite is inserting unsupported options on AIX. Complaints about -dA, -dD, -dumpbase, etc. This patch was not properly tested on all targets. Please fix or revert this patc

Re: GCC Testsuite patches break AIX

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:16 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > Hello, David, > > On May 26, 2020, David Edelsohn wrote: > > > Complaints about -dA, -dD, -dumpbase, etc. > > This was the main symptom of the problem fixed in the follow-up commit > r11-635-g6232d02b4f

Re: Push to my private branches is disallowed

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:13 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:47:48AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > These are all the reasons why I don't use GCC repo for my personal > > branches. > > Yeah, but I thought a lot of different GCC people might be interested in > my "nuke CC0" p

Re: Modula-2 into the GCC tree on master?

Hi, Gaius Thanks for your diligent effort to complete this port of Modula-2 and prepare it for inclusion in GCC. I have forwarded the proposal to the GCC Steering Committee. Thanks, David On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 5:03 PM Gaius Mulley via Gcc wrote: > > > Hello GCC Steering Committee and fellow

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform first > as a primary target, however it's not mentioned for GCC 9 and GCC 10. Just an > omission? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00854.html su

Re: documentation of powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu as primary platform

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:07 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 7/9/20 1:58 PM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:03 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > >> > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-8/criteria.html lists the little endian platform > >> first

Re: Crash at gimple_code(gimple* )

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:07 AM Shuai Wang via Gcc wrote: > > Hello! > > Thank you very much. I use the following statement to check and I confirm > that it's not SSA_NAME: > > if (TREE_CODE(operand) != SSA_NAME) return; > > But considering the following code snippet: > > _313 = _312 + 2147450880

Re: Tar version being used

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 7:58 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:59 PM CHIGOT, CLEMENT via Gcc > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm wondering if someone knows which tar version / configuration was being > > used when creating gcc-10.2.0 tarballs ? > > > > I'm get

Re: LTO Dead Field Elimination

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:03 AM Christoph Müllner wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > On 7/27/20 2:36 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:43 PM Erick Ochoa > > wrote: > >> > >> This patchset brings back struct reorg to GCC. > >> > >> We’ve been working on improving cache utilization re

Re: GCC / GFortran (9.3.0; Cygwin 64 and Ubuntu) Internal Compiler Error on NINT() Function

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:34 AM Bernd Eggen via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > I realised when I created the small code snippet I accidentally put the > variable "m" in the default integer declaration, I checked it and moving it > (to kind=16) does not make a difference either. > > I also checked on U

Re: duplicate arm test results?

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 8:26 AM Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 12:26, Richard Earnshaw > wrote: > > > > On 23/09/2020 11:20, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:22:52AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > >> So that would give: > > >> > > >>

GCC PowerPC bootstrap and irange

The latest irange patch has broken bootstrap for PowerPC In file included from /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/tree-ssa-propagate.h:25:0, from /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c:67: /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/value-query.h:90:31: error: 'irange' has not bee

Re: Multilib Hierarchy

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:09 AM CHIGOT, CLEMENT via Gcc wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Since no one answered, I assume that MULTILIB_REUSE was indeed not the > solution. > Thus, I've implemented a solution using a new target macro MULTILIB_FALLBACK. > It allows any target to return a new multilib su

Re: Fortran Shared Coarrays for GCC 11

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:52 PM Nicolas König wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm hoping to get shared coarrays for fortran (the devel/coarray_native > branch) merged for GCC 11 as an experimental feature, but, since the > library uses a lot of low-level routines, I'm a bit scared of breaking > bo

Claudiu Zissulescu appointed ARC Co-Maintainer

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Claudiu Zissulescu as ARC Co-Maintainer. Please join me in congratulating Claudiu on his new role. Claudiu, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Re: [EXTERNAL]Re: MIPS Maintainer

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:52 PM Chao-ying Fu wrote: > > Hi Maciej, > > > Great to hear from you again! > > It's great to hear from you, too! > > > > We just wonder if you can sponsor me to become a MIPS maintainer, > > > because Wave Computing would like to continue supporting MIPS > > > arch

Re: Copyright assignment for Rust-GCC

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:29 AM Nala Ginrut via Gcc wrote: > > Hi Folks! > This mail is about the development of Rust frontend of GCC. > > To avoid misunderstanding, please let me introduce Rust-GCC briefly. > In 2013, Philip Herron had announced the project in GCC mailing-list: > https://gcc.gnu.o

Re: Copyright assignment for Rust-GCC

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 1/4/21 11:01 PM, Eric Gallager via Gcc wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:13 AM David Edelsohn via Gcc > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:29 AM Nala Ginrut via Gcc > >> wrote: &g

Re: Copyright assignment for Rust-GCC

C folks? > > Best regards. > > > Eric Gallager writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:13 AM David Edelsohn via Gcc > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:29 AM Nala Ginrut via Gcc > >> wrote: > >> > > >> &

Re: Google GSOC Idea

Are you trying to propose a JavaScript / TypeScript front-end and associated runtime for GCC? I don't believe that anyone would object to that. It probably is much too ambitious for a GSoC project. You could propose a subset as a GSoC project. It's unclear if you already have a preliminary impl

Re: Copyright Forms Request

Sent privately. - David On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:08 PM Anthony Sharp via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > Hope all is well. Please could I have a copy of the form to assign > copyright of all future changes. > > Kind regards, > Anthony Sharp

Re: Copyright assignment paperwork request

Sent off-list. - David On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:43 AM Harris Snyder wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to start contributing to GCC. As such, from my > understanding, I need to file some paperwork related to copyright > assignment. If there is a set of paperwork that would cover all future > cont

Re: Copyright Assignment Form

Sent off list. - David On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:28 PM Akshat Agarwal via Gcc wrote: > > Hey, > I would like to contribute some patches to the gccrs project > (https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/) and I'd like to get a copyright > assignment form as per the guidelines outlined at > https://gc

Re: Request for copyright assignment form

See off list. Thanks, David On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:08 AM The Other via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to get a copyright assignment form for GCC. I believe that > https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html states that the right place to get such a > form is here. > > Thanks, > Theo

Re: What is pex_run

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:26 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: > > I've got collect2 finding a linker error and I'm out of > other options so I'm poking around in the collect2 > sources. I'm wondering what pex_run is (since it's > getting handed the arguments this might mater?) > I figure if I can get

Re: Request for Copyright Assignment Form

Replied off-list. Thanks, David On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ansh Tyagi via Gcc wrote: > > Hey, > I would like to contribute in Rust-GCC/gccrs so I am requesting a Copyright > Assignment Form. Let me know if there are any more steps to contribute. > > Thanks & Regards > Ansh Tyagi

Re: Copyright assignment

Replied off-list. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 9:49 AM George Liakopoulos via Gcc wrote: > > Dear GCC Community , > > I am planning to contribute in Rust-GCC project ( > https://github.com/Rust-GCC) , so I think it will be good to have the > copyright assignment from now on . > > Waiting for your repl

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:28 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 1:36 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > You are referencing the recent open letter which isn't really what > > people are discussing here. Although many probably sympathize with > > calling for the removal of t

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:46 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * David Edelsohn via Gcc: > > > Has the GCC SC blocked any new port or major feature? Not that I'm aware > > of. > > What about the plugin framework? The libgcc licensing change would > not have happe

Re: Having trouble getting my school to sign the copyright disclaimer

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:28 AM PKU via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > I’m trying to get my school to sign the copyright disclaimer. Unfortunately > the officials are reluctant to do that. Can anyone suggest what to do next? > > They claim that university owns copyright to my code if I wrote it for a

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

[I previously sent this from another email account, but it seems to be lost. I am sending this on behalf of the GCC Steering Committee.] In 2012 RMS was added to the GCC Steering Committee web page based on his role in the GNU Project, though his role as a member of the Steering Committee has bee

Re: RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee

As we have expressed, the GCC Steering Committee doesn't micromanage the development of GCC. The technical decisions are made by the Release Managers and the various maintainers. But if you want to play nationality bingo, let's play and see what we find, shall we? The three GCC Release Managers

Re: Default debug format for AVR

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:34 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 10:56 PM Simon Marchi via Gcc wrote: > > > > On 2021-04-05 3:36 p.m., Jim Wilson wrote:> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 6:24 PM > > Simon Marchi via Gcc mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote: > > > > > > The default deb

Re: Default debug format for AVR

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:03 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > On April 8, 2021 1:17:53 AM GMT+02:00, David Edelsohn > wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:34 AM Richard Biener via Gcc > >wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 10:56 PM Simon Marchi via Gcc >

Re: Default debug format for AVR

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:41 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 4/8/2021 8:06 AM, Simon Marchi via Gcc wrote: > > On 2021-04-08 9:11 a.m., David Edelsohn wrote: > >>>> AIX continues to use and support STABS, although it is transitioning > >>>> to DWARF. If thi

Re: Default debug format for AVR

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:09 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:41 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 4/8/2021 8:06 AM, Simon Marchi via Gcc wrote: > > > On 2021-04-08 9:11 a.m., David Edelsohn wrote: > > >>>> AIX continues to use an

Re: Copyright Assignment Form

Replied privately. On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 8:37 AM Ruihan Li via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > > I'd like to contribute to the gccrs project > (https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs) and they require contributions to have > copyright assignment in place. Could you please tell me what I sho

Re: GCC association with the FSF

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 8:40 PM Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:36 AM Pankaj Jangid wrote: > > > > I think, it would be great help if someone can document what the SC > > does. > > I don't know whether anybody actually tried to answer this. > > The main job of the GC

Re: Gcc as callable libraries (was: removing toxic emailers)

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 5:04 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > David, > > for some reason or other, I did not get your mail, so I will > just reply copying in from the archive. > > First, thanks for injecting some sanity into the discussion. > > I will not discuss RMS' personal shortcomings or t

Re: GCC 11.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > The first release candidate for GCC 11.1 is available from > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11.1.0-RC-20210420/ > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11.1.0-RC-20210420 > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated

Re: [gnu.org #282142] Copyright assignment for GCC Hello World

I am not sure why the copyright clerk forwarded this to the general GCC mailinglist instead of helping you obtain an assignment form, but we can proceed anyway. Do you work for any university or company that could claim ownership of your code? If no, you directly can assign your c

Re: GCC 11.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc > wrote: > > > The first release candidate for GCC 11.1 is available from > > https://gcc.gnu.o

Re: GCC 11.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:23 PM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers > wrote: > > > On 2021-04-20 15:25, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 12:43 PM J

Re: GCC 11.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:43 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:23 PM Thomas Rodgers > wrote: > > > > On 2021-04-20 17:09, David Edelsohn wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:52 PM Thomas Rodgers > > wrote: > > > > &g

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 5:25 AM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:34 PM Martin Liška wrote: > >> > >> Hello. > >> > >> I've got a patch candidate that leverages partial linking for a couple of > >> selected object files. > >> > >> I'm

Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

GCC was created as part of the GNU Project but has grown to operate as an autonomous project. The GCC Steering Committee has decided to relax the requirement to assign copyright for all changes to the Free Software Foundation. GCC will continue to be developed, distributed, and licensed under the

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:15 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 10:00:06AM -0400, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > GCC was created as part of the GNU Project but has grown to operate as > > an autonomous project. > > > > The GCC Steering Comm

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > > > GCC was created as part of the GNU Project but has grown to operate as > > an autonomous project. > > > > The GCC Steering Committee has decided to relax the requirement to > > assign copyright for all changes to the Free Software Fou

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:40 AM Paul Koning wrote: > > > On Jun 1, 2021, at 10:31 AM, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: > > > > The copyright author will be listed as "Free Software Foundation, > > Inc." and/or "The GNU Toolchain Authors", as appro

Re: Update to GCC copyright assignment policy

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:11 AM Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > On June 7, 2021 7:35:01 AM UTC, Richard Biener > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:27 PM Jason Merrill via Gcc > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:46 AM Giacomo Tesio > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I would

Re: Some libgcc headers are missing the runtime exception

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 12:53 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > It was pointed out to me off-list that config/aarch64/value-unwind.h > is missing the runtime exception. It looks like a few other files > are too; a fuller list is: > > libgcc/config/aarch64/value-unwind.h > libgcc/conf

Re: Some libgcc headers are missing the runtime exception

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:31 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > David Edelsohn writes: > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 12:53 PM Richard Sandiford via Gcc > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> It was pointed out to me off-list that config/aarch64/val

Re: Proper Place for builtin_define(__ELF__)

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:09 PM Jeff Law via Gcc wrote: > > > > On 7/21/2021 6:31 PM, Michael Eager wrote: > > > > > > On 7/21/21 5:22 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021, 7:12 PM Michael Eager >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 7/21/21 2:28 PM, Joel

Re: Expensive selftests (was: 'hash_map>')

This causes a bootstrap failure for me. PR/101959 On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 5:00 AM Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:40 AM Thomas Schwinge > wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On 2021-08-16T14:10:00-0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > > > On 8/16/21 6:44 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >

Harald Anlauf appointed Fortran Reviewer

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Harald Anlauf as a Fortran Reviewer. Please join me in congratulating Harald on his new role. Harald, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

GCC Register Pressure BoF notes

Richi and Aaron, Thanks for the great conversation about register pressure at the GCC BoF at LPC2021. It was a very productive session with good ideas about how to proceed. Where do you suggest that I place the Register pressure BoF notes? GCC Wiki? Email it to the GCC mailing list? Bugzilla?

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:59:53AM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > On 05.10.21 23:54, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > >>There is also the issue of binary data. If some user has written > > >>out data in double double and wants to read it

Re: libgfortran.so SONAME and powerpc64le-linux ABI changes

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 12:21 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 11:42:17AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:59:53AM +0200, Thomas Koe

Re: Broken links on website

The Binaries information on the website is generated from the Binaries information in the GCC Install docs. I updated the links in the docs. Thanks for alerting us to the broken links. Thanks, David On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:14 AM Ryan Plant wrote: > > Just a quick heads-up , https://gcc.gnu.or

Re: How to get started with contribution

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:27 PM Prakhar Khandelwal via Gcc wrote: > > Hey !! > I, Prakhar Khandelwal, am currently in the 3rd year of my engineering and > majoring in Computer Science. I always wanted to work at a low level in > software. That's why I want to contribute to your organization but >

Re: How to get started with contribution

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 5:07 AM Purvak Baliyan via Gcc wrote: > > Respected Sir/Madam > > I am Purvak Baliyan, an Information Technology undergrad, I have entered my > third year at DR. Akhilesh Das Gupta Institute of Technology & > Management(ADGITM). I am new to open source contributions but i a

Re: how to get started with contribution

On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 10:37 AM VAISHNAVI DAYANAND via Gcc wrote: > > Respected sir/madam, > I am Vaishnavi Andhalkar, a junior undergrad at IIT Roorkee. I have > recently started contributing to open source, and I am new at it. But, I am > well aware of C++, programming and algorithms, and javas

Re: How to get started with Contribution

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 2:45 AM Purvak Baliyan via Gcc wrote: > > Respected Sir/Madam > > I am Purvak Baliyan, an Information Technology undergrad, I have entered my > third year at DR. Akhilesh Das Gupta Institute of Technology & > Management(ADGITM). I am new to open source contributions but i a

Re: GSoC

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 10:40 AM Γιωργος Μελλιος via Gcc wrote: > > Greetings, > > I am sending this email in order to show my interest in your GSoC program > for this summer. > To begin with, I would like to learn some general information about your > project in order to judge if I am capable of

Re: Contribution

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:37 AM farhad via Gcc wrote: > > TO whom it may concern, > I'm Farhad Sarvari and I have been working as a software engineer for more > than 10 years and also have a strong background in c++ programming language. > In addition I wrote a book about modern C++. >

Re: Announcement: gcobol

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:35 PM James K. Lowden wrote: > > https://git.symas.net:443/cobolworx/gcc-cobol/ > https://github.com/Apress/beg-cobol-for-programmers > > Greetings, gcc! We come bearing gifts! > > When you set your clock ahead an hour yesterday, you might not have > realized you set you

Re: Query regarding GSoC

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 1:39 PM Riva Malthiyar via Gcc wrote: > > Respected mentor, > I am Riva Malthiyar from India. I am experienced in C/C++. I saw the list > of projects in your GSoC project ideas and wish to work in one of them. In > the "Before You Apply" Section there is something related t

Re: passing command-line arguments, still

On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 1:11 PM James K. Lowden wrote: > > I'm collecting my remarks in one reply here, hopefully for easier > reading. I want to offer my thanks, and also my assessment of the > situation as I understand it. My critique is intended as purely > constructive. > > I understand vagu

LoongArch port accepted and maintainers appointed

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has accepted the LoongArch port for inclusion in GCC and appointed Chenghua Xu and Lulu Cheng as maintainers. Please work with Richard Sandiford on the final technical review and approval of the patches. Please coordinate with the GCC Relea

Kewen Lin as PowerPC port co-maintainer

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Kewen Lin as GCC PowerPC port Co-Maintainer. Please join me in congratulating Kewen on his new role. Kewen, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Re: How target.md file with target.c/.cc file invoke assembly instructions

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:46 AM RICHU NORMAN wrote: > > Hi, > I am new in gcc development and I am focusing on cross-compilers.I have > added a few instructions for the target machine in binutils and invoked it > using asm() from c program.Now I want to add those instructions to gcc and > define t

Re: GNU Tools Cauldron 2022

On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 7:03 PM Jan Hubicka via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > We are pleased to invite you all to the next GNU Tools Cauldron, > taking place in Paris on September 16-18, 2022. We are looking forward > to meet you again after three years! Did you intend to announce the location as Pr

Re:

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:21 PM Skrab Skrab via Gcc wrote: > > How can i contribute to gcc. Thanks for your interest in GCC. Welcome! A good place to start is the GCC Wiki Getting Started page: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/#Getting_Started_with_GCC_Development and browse other recent answers to si

Re: remove intl/ directory?

On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 1:44 PM Iain Sandoe via Gcc wrote: > > Hi Bruno, > > > On 18 Jun 2022, at 18:01, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > As the long-term GNU gettext maintainer, I would suggest to remove the intl/ > > directory from the GCC distribution. > > > > The effect for the users would be: > >

Re: Wants to contribute!!

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 3:32 AM Aman Jha via Gcc wrote: > > Hii, > > I wants to contribute in gcc, i have contributed in some good open source > project like Libreoffice. > > I have good knowledge of c++ and git I am still learning c++ and want to > contribute. > > I also participated in hactoberfe

Re: Rust front-end

e the others. > > I wish to thank you those in the GCC developer community, who have > inspired me and helped me navigate my journey to this point in time. > > - Thomas Schwinge > - Mark Wielaard > - Tom Tromey > - Ian Lance Taylor > - David Edelsohn > - David Malc

Re: Inquiry: Country of Origin for gfortran

Should this question be posed to the Linux distribution that NASA is using? Thanks, David On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 4:56 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > Hi Cynthia, > > > Hello, my name is Cynthia and I am a Supply Chain Risk Management > > Analyst at NASA. NASA is currently conducting a sup

Marc Poulhies appointed Ada co-maintainer

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Marc Poulhies as Ada co-maintainer. Please join me in congratulating Marc on his new role. Marc, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Re: State of AutoFDO in GCC

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 4:13 PM Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc wrote: > > Hello GCC community. > > I started this thread on the state of AutoFDO in GCC more than a year ago. > Here is the first message in the thread: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-April/235860.html > > Since then I committed

Indu Bhagat and David Faust appointed CTF and BTF Reviewers

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Indu Bhagat and David Faust as CTF and BTF Reviewers. Please join me in congratulating Indu and David on their new role. Indu and David, please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Eugene Rozenfeld appointed AutoFDO maintainer

I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed Eugene Rozenfeld as AutoFDO maintainer. Please join me in congratulating Eugene on his new role. Eugene, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file. Happy hacking! David

Re: Reproducible builds - supporting relative paths in *-prefix-map

On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:28 AM Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 12:13 +0100, Richard Purdie via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm wondering if we'd be able to improve path handling in the -f*- > > prefix-map compiler options to cover relative paths? > > > > Currently it works

The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project

Carlos O'Donell and I are proud to announce and provide more detail about the GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project. https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q3/018896.html Thanks, David

Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 4:05 PM David Edelsohn wrote: > Carlos O'Donell and I are proud to announce and provide more detail about > the GNU Toolchain Infrastructure project. > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q3/018896.html > > Thanks, David > The minu

Re: gcc-bug in gcc-11

On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 12:18 PM Shivam Rajput via Gcc wrote: > Hey, I was trying to build clang's libcxx on my ubuntu 22.04 and it has > gcc-11.2 by default most prolly, but while building libcxx there was an > error about using the deleted function but it seems that overloaded > resolution in gc

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >