On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 10:08 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> It looks like -mcpu=common (on the powerpc archite
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I propose to mark powerpc*-*-*spe* as obsolete in GCC 7. This includes
> the spe.h installed header file, all the __builtin_spe* intrinsics, the
> -mfloat-gprs= command-line option, and the support for the SPE ABIs.
>
> No
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:38:40PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:36:02AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
>> > > Since we've been talking about obsoleti
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 03:19 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:49:47PM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I propose to mark powerpc*-*-*spe* as obsolete in GCC 7. This includes
the spe.h installed header fil
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> On Feb 17, 2017, at 01:10 , David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> This is not a new issue. The maintainer did not suddenly resign last
>> week. There have been numerous efforts to reach out to t
A fund to benefit the components of the GNU Toolchain (GCC, GDB,
GLIBC, Binutils, Sourceware) has been established at the Free Software
Foundation.
Personal and corporate donations are welcome!
http://www.fsf.org/news/gnu-toolchain-now-accepting-donations-with-the-support-of-the-free-software-fou
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:49 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> A fund to benefit the components of the GNU Toolchain (GCC, GDB,
>> GLIBC, Binutils, Sourceware) has been established at the Free Software
>> Foundatio
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 08:26 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> Since SPE and VLE only share the part of the rs6000 port that doesn't
>> change at all (except for a bug fix once or twice a year), and everything
>> else needs special cases all over
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Simon Wright wrote:
> I see that, in the GCC 7 Release Criteria, the Secondary Platforms list
> includes i686-apple-darwin.
>
> Should this now be x86_64-apple-darwin? I've been building this since GCC
> 4.5.0, Darwin 10, in 2011.
If the Darwin maintainers conc
Can you file this as a bug report in GCC Bugzilla?
I assume that the target is Alpha?
Thanks, David
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:11 AM, comp wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I recently have a problem with LRA.
> 1 The Bug use case
> int a=10;
> float c=2.0,d;
> main()
> {
> float b;
> *(int*)&
gcc.gnu.org and sourceware.org are hosted by Red Hat datacenter, which
apparently experienced a widespread problem.
http://status.redhat.com/
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> I am having problems getting to https://gcc.gnu.org this morning and
> I have also had problems
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:03 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 06:59 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
>> bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
>> on FreeBSD. The generated file gcc/options.h contains
>> code of
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:55 AM, David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs Ltd
wrote:
>
> Dear GCC Steering Committee,
>
> I am David, founder of AdaLabs Ltd, a software engineering startup
> having expertise in Ada programming language technologies. As a summary,
> we would like to know if gcc has interest in an
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 12:54 PM, David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs Ltd
wrote:
> On 04/29/2017 06:31 PM, David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs Ltd wrote:
>> On 04/28/2017 06:47 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:55 AM, David SAUVAGE - AdaLabs Ltd
>>> wrote:
>&
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 05/18/2017 11:59 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2017 11:41 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> I just tried to push a change and got the error below. git
>>> pull says my tree is up to date. I wonder if it's caused by
>>> my commit confli
The GCC Community needs a few people to help approve GCC Bugzilla accounts.
Because of SPAM, the GCC Community had to disable the creation of new
accounts. We need a few dedicated, reliable individuals who can
review account requests and manage the process of authorizing Bugzilla
accounts. This
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the D Language front-end and runtime for inclusion in GCC
and appointed Iain Buclaw as maintainer.
The patches still require approval by a Global Reviewer.
Please join me in congratulating Iain on his ne
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Andrew Jenner as PowerPC SPE port maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Andrew on his new role.
Andrew, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:38 AM, 吴潍浠(此彼) wrote:
> Hi Jeff
>
> I have signed the copyright assignment, and used the name 'Wish Wu' .
> Should I send you a copy of my assignment ?
Your assignment now is on file in the FSF Copyright Assignment list
where Jeff, I and other maintainers can see it. We
FYI, DejaGNU 1.6.1 is not compatible with the GCC Testsuite. The GCC
Testsuite uses "unsetenv" in multiple instances and that feature has
been removed from DejaGNU. The testsuite is going to experience
DejaGNU errors when Fedora or OpenSUSE upgrades to a more recent
DejaGNU in the 1.6 series.
-
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:01 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> FYI, DejaGNU 1.6.1 is not compatible with the GCC Testsuite. The GCC
>> Testsuite uses "unsetenv" in multiple instances and that feature has
>> been remov
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:43 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:32 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:01 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>> FYI, DejaGNU 1.6.1 is not compatible wi
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi H.J.,
>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:32 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:24 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:01 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>> F
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 14:55, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Rainer Orth
>> wrote:
>>> Hi H.J.,
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:32 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:40 AM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Full disclosure: despite my interest in the architecture I have not
> been able to get access to a POWER8 machine. A server costs about as
> much as a new car. Any account reseller recommendations or any other
> options you can think of? If you don'
s, but I did get an
> environment working on GCC10.
>
> Respectfully,
> R0b0t1
>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, 10 September 2017, R0b0t1 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello list, has anyone experienced problems on the AIX POWER8 system?
>>>
>>> -- For
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> The system was configured to maximize diskspace and flexibility. It
>> now is supporting six, separate VMs. The disk array was configured as
>> a single physical volume, mapped to a single logical volume, that then
>> is pa
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have attached revamped version of Kugan's original patch for type promotion
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00472.html)
> rebased on r249469. The motivation of the pass is to minimize
> generation of subregs
> to
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Pierre-Marie de Rodat as Ada co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Pierre-Marie on his new role.
P-M, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 09:01 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am internally running buildbot for a few projects, including one for a
>> simple gcc setup for a private port. After some discussions with David
>&g
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Tom de Vries as nvptx maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Tom on his new role.
Tom, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I would like to update the top level libtool files (libtool.m4,
> ltoptions.m4, ltsugar.m4, ltversion.m4 and lt~obsolete.m4) used by
> gcc, gdb and binutils. Currently we have version 2.2.7a installed in
> the source tree
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to update the documentation of these compiler flags and have
> some questions. The -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections documentation
> is currently:
>
> "Place each function or data item into its own section in
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>>> Do these options affect the code generation?
>> They can affect code generation. By placing each object into its own
>> section it's no longer viable to use one object to refer to another
>> because the relative addresses are unknown u
>> It places each function and each datum into a separate section, which
>> can be placed or removed independently. It is not combining data or
>> altering the order of structures. It allows the linker to position
>> functions and data items as individual components instead of a single
>> object
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 06:39:20PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> Jim has recently started working at SiFive, where he'll be contributing
>> to our GCC port. Andrew, Kito and I would like him to be a mainatiner.
>> My understand is that this
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Nathália Harumi
wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Nathália Harumi, I'm a student of The University of Campinas.
>
> I'm working on validation projects on OpenPower lab (which is a partnership
> between IBM and The University of Campinas, in Brazil) and we'd like to
> find a
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 01:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>> Huh, that bites. Im surprised we don't just make those places produce a
>>> cast, or just introduce an explicit cast of the (void *)0 during the
>>> expression building process.
>>
>> I'm quite
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Jim Wilson as RISC-V co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Jim on his additional role.
Jim, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Bin Cheng as Loop Optimizer co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Bin on his new role.
Bin, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Martin Liska as GCOV co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Martin on his new role.
Martin, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:16 AM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> Janus Weil :
> > > The bad news is that my last test run overran the memnory capacity of
> > > the 64GB Great Beast. I shall have to find some way of reducing the
> > > working set, as 128GB DD4 memory is hideously expensive.
> >
> > Or ma
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:35 PM Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> David Edelsohn :
> > > The truth is we're near the bleeding edge of what conventional tools
> > > and hardware can handle gracefully. Most jobs with working sets as
> > > big as this one's do
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:32 AM Eric S. Raymond
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:13:16PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > Have you considered bisecting your recent changes to reposurgeon to
> > determine which one caused the errors in the conversion of GCC Trunk
>
AIX 5.3 no longer is under supported or maintained.
- David
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:13 PM Albert Chin
wrote:
>
> r227907 had the following change:
> Index: aix61.h
> ===
> --- aix61.h (revision 227906)
> +++ aix61.h (revis
You must manually insert the additional test lines into the appropriate
file in fixincludes/tests/base and then retest.
Please see step (6) in fixincludes/README
Thanks, David
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:46 PM Albert Chin
wrote:
> Hi. I've come up with a fixincl fix for PR86599 but "make chec
.
You also can try to ask Bruce Korb for some advice. Few modern targets
require fixincludes.
Thanks, David
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 4:38 PM Albert Chin
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 03:52:33PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > You must manually insert the additional test lines into
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Richard Sandiford as a Global Reviewer.
Please join me in congratulating Richard on his new role.
Richard, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:37 AM 瞿仙淼 wrote:
> Hi,
> Although we are the maintainer of the C-SKY backend, we still
> don't have an account.
> Can anybody help us to approved our registering request?
> We will be very grateful for this.
>
Registering request for what? For
AIX provides two versions of long double and declares all of the C99
long double symbols in math.h header file. One implementation aliases
long double to IEEE double precision type and the other implementation
aliases long double to IBM's paired double format. All of the C99
symbols for IEEE doub
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> I can't quite figure out what the score people are up to, but it doesn't
> appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components
> that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux
> kernel support
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Michael Haubenwallner
wrote:
>
> On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> AIX provides two versions of long double and declares all of the C99
>> long double symbols in math.h header file. One implementation aliases
>> lo
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Ramana Radhakrishnan as co-maintainer of the ARM port.
Please join me in congratulating Ramana on his new role.
Ramana, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Qin wei wrote:
> Hello gcc maintainers:
>
> I'm Qinwei from Sunnorth. I volunteer to be a Score gcc maintainer and
> I'm eager to do more contributions to gcc. Previously i maintained
> Score gdb, binutils and glibc rtld for Sunnorth. Could i do that? If i
> could,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
> I'm currently trying to backport a small part of gcc 4.5 r151729 to
> gcc 4.4.3. This revision fixes a problem in powerpc code generation
> that leads to gcc not using lmw/stmw instructions in function prologue
> and epilogues, where it coul
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/04/11 19:14, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>> Another danger is getting a mob effect as in PR48403 (which I've also
>> seen happen on other occasions) and getting the wrong set of patches
>> rev
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with
> some coming changes to how dwarf2 cfi is to be generated.
>
> Some suggested solutions are:
>
> (1) Remove the option. Is it really that interesting
> beyond -mno-sched
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/05/2011 04:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> The implementation of TARGET_SCHED_PROLOG is incompatible with
>>> some coming changes to how dw
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
promoted Vladimir Makarov to Register Allocation Maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Vlad.
Please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I got agreement from two global reviewers and no objections.
>
> I have committed this patch.
>
> Please let me know about any problems.
This also breaks bootstrap on AIX. I cannot debug further at the
moment because of a separate probl
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Paolo has committed a change to that code, does it help the AIX bootstrap
> issue?
Paolo's patch gets me past the debug.cc issue.
Using C++ on AIX will greatly increase the bootstrap time on AIX
because configure is much slower, even us
AIX needs libsupc++ for libstdc++ static linking.
* Makefile.tpl (POSTSTAGE1_CONFIGURE_FLAGS): Add libsupc++ to
link directories.
* Makefile.in: Rebuild.
Index: Makefile.tpl
===
--- Makefile.tpl(revision 17648
I now can get through the build of the compiler, but stage2 and stage3
libstdc++ and libsupc++ files have many comparison failures due to
tree.c:get_file_function_name() introducing explicit randomness to
produce different symbols for anonymous namespaces:
/* Otherwise, the name must be uniq
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 20, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Interesting. I don't know why this doesn't happen on GNU/Linux.
>
> It doesn't happen as the symbols in question are local on linux. collect2
> runs nm on public symbols looking for symb
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Presumably the fix will be to use -frandom-seed. Does this patch fix
> the problem? (The only real change is to fragment.am, the other changes
> are all generated by automake).
This patch gets the build past the compiler and runtime, a
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Thomas Henlich
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to contribute code to GFortran, starting with some work
> on http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906, but maybe more
> in the future.
>
> Please could you send me the necessary forms for copyright assignment
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Hagen Meyer wrote:
> But HOW can I force the operand into memory?
> I.e. "force_const_to_memref" needs to be defined somehow.
> Any hints?
varasm.c:force_const_mem() ?
- David
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Quoting Richard Guenther :
>
>>> So are you saying that we should remove the recursive nature of the
>>> rtx_cost/targetm.rtx_costs interface, and have the backend handle any
>>> recursion itself? I.e. targetm.rtx_costs only ever sees a com
My latest bootstrap of GCC on AIX failed due to missing symbols in
libstdc++ expected by libgmpxx:
exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load
program /tmp/20110922/./gcc/cc1plus/tmp/20110922/./g
cc/cc1plus because of the following errors:
because of the following errors:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
> dump -H libstdc++.so.6
>
> ./powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so.6.orig:
>
> ***Loader Section***
> Loader Header Information
> VERSION# #SYMtableENT #RELOCent
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
> libgomp.so.1 wants libc.a, libpthreads.a, and libgcc_s.a. The first two do
> not present a problem. But there are four libgcc_s.a (normal, ppc64,
> pthread, and ppc64+pthread).
>
> Note that there is also four versions of libgomp.so.1 (no
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
> One more question on this quest (drifting a little more off topic).
> In my log files I see a lot of these errors:
>
> ld: 0711-768 WARNING: Object
> ../libsupc++/.libs/libsupc++convenience.a[eh_terminate.o], section 1,
> function .std::termin
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> I wonder if it might make sense to more strongly suggest to use GNU as
>> on AIX? The install manual currently says
>>
>> The native @command{as} and @command{ld} are recommended for
>> bootstrapping
>> on AIX@. The GNU Assembler, GNU Lin
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Given that you only recently merged with trunk again are you really
> sure this is a great
> idea at this point in time? Does the GCC 4.7 user community benefit from this
> in any way (or rather how much percentage of it)?
GCC has a hist
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> > FWIW, we've recently made this choice/switch for GNAT at AdaCore, which
>> > allows us in particular to use dwarf-2/3 debug info.
>>
>> Is AdaCore maintaining GNU Binutils on AIX?
>
> We're "maintaining" it sufficiently for our needs, ye
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> powerpc-rtems does not compile on the head due
> to what appear to be changes in the way CPU
> features are represented for the arguments.
>
> The compilation error is:
>
> /users/joel/test-gcc/gcc-svn/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c -o rs
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/17/2011 12:37 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> - oldval = convert_modes (SImode, mode, oldval, 1);
>> + oldval = gen_reg_rtx (SImode);
>> + convert_move (oldval, orig, 1);
>> oldval = expand_simple_binop (SImode, ASHIF
David,
See PR 50325.
- David
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:22 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> For a few days a lot of new testsuite failures have popped up on sparc,
> wherein int_mode_for_mode() gets called with "VOIDmode" as an argument
> from extract_bit_field_1 because "op0" is "(const_int 0)"
>
>
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Jeff Evarts wrote:
> Apparently my question "Has anyone done X and what were the results"
> has been mysteriously translated into "The GCC compiler is way too
> slow and what are you lazy developers going to do to speed up my
> compiles?!?". I will be more careful
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Joern Rennecke as maintainer of the new Epiphany port.
Please join me in congratulating Joern on his new role.
Joern, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Rohit Arul Raj wrote:
> And with ‘-O3’ and above, we cannot switch OFF the flag
> ‘-fira-loop-pressure’, because it has been explicitly overridden in
> the PPC backend target files.
>
> 1) Is it possible to update the heuristic to allow this optimization.
> 2) If
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Tim Crook wrote:
> Thanks David.
>
> I thought -mmininal-toc might have been a better workaround as well :-) .
>
> Is there a Bugzilla number for this issue?
I believe this was GCC Bugzilla Bug 24779. It partially was fixed in
GCC 4.1, but not fully fixed until D
Toon,
Graphite uses PPL, not PolyLib. PPL should be installed and the
polylib include path will be avoided.
David
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> As is pointed out in this config.log:
>
> In file included from conftest.c:12:
> /usr/include/cloog/cloog.h:47:30: error: polyli
OFTC is rejecting all connections from me as well.
David
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> I haven't been able to connect to #gcc today. Is anyone else having
>> trouble connecting?
>
> Wonder if it is somethin
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Joseph Myers as GCC driver reviewer.
Please join me in congratulating Joseph on his new role.
Joseph, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> Please download, compile and run "make check" for this release and post
> your results as well your target triplet and the versions of your
> compiler, gmp and mpfr. All platform results are welcome, but I am
> especially interested in GCC'
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Lattice Mico32 port for inclusion in GCC. The initial
patch needs approval from a GCC GWP maintainer before it may be committed.
Happy hacking!
David
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> Can't we use graphite to re-roll loops? That is, compress the
> polyhedron by introducing a new parameter? But maybe I am
> not good at guessing what your initial bloat issue looks like.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that there is enough
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Paul Edwards wrote:
>>> But from the Unix system, I need to be able to generate the
>>> above very simple compile script, which is a precursor to creating
>>> very simple JCL steps (trust me, you don't want to see what
>>> ST2CMP looks like). Note that the JCL ha
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Diego Novillo, Rafael Avila de Espindola, and Richard Guenther
as LTO Reviewers, and Rafael Avila de Espindola and Cary Coutant as
LTO Plugin Reviewers.
Thanks to everyone for their hard work bringing LTO to GCC
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Jon Beniston wrote:
>> The port is ok to check in.
>
> Great - so can I apply it, or does someone else need to?
Until you have write access to the repository, someone else needs to
commit the patch for you.
The GCC community generally likes to see a few examples
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> A prerelease tarball of the upcoming mpc-0.8 is available here:
> http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/download/mpc-0.8-dev.tar.gz
>
> This release is feature complete with respect to C99 and GCC's needs.
> So I expect to make this version be
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>> From: "David Edelsohn"
>>
>> MPC-0.8 build fails on AIX due to libtool. The changes to libtool
>> between MPC-0.7 and MPC-0.8 rely on Bash-specific features. Manually
>> editing libtool to use B
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> So IIUC, David is setting SHELL=/path/to/bash first, then running
> configure, then getting an error. This happens because configure tests
> that bash understands +=, but libtool is run with (presumably) /bin/sh and
> doesn't understand +=
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Could you please provide the testing details so we can note it in the MPC
> platforms page? I.e. target triplet plus gcc/gmp/mpfr versions. Or just
> confirm they are the same as the report you gave for the previous MPC
> release noted h
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> And do we want to update aix5.2 to aix5.3 in our platforms list?
AIX should be updated to 5.3 or 6.1.
David
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Are there any plans for further merges out of the
> graphite branch before gcc 4.5 is branched? I was
> under the impression that the graphite developers
> originally intended to keep trunk more closely
> synchronized with the graphite bran
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Ian Bolton wrote:
> From some simple experiments (see below), it appears as though GCC aims
> to
> create a lop-sided tree when there are constants involved (func1 below),
> but a balanced tree when there aren't (func2 below).
>
> Our assumption is that GCC likes
A change on November 23 is causing every C++ testcase to fail on AIX
because of _ZNSsD1Ev not being exported. c++filt reports the symbol
corresponds to
std::basic_string, std::allocator
>::~basic_string [in-charge]()
David
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Hutchinson
wrote:
> How does one get to be maintainer of port?
>
> Specifically AVR port - so that I do not need to get approval to commit
> changes. The time it takes now is rather longer than getting approval on
> other parts of GCC.
>
> The process does n
201 - 300 of 733 matches
Mail list logo
