Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Breuer
Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: >> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following >> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages: >> >> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c >> index a9fa608..dfbd6

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer : >> Richard Henderson wrote: >>> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: >>>> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following >>>> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:

Re: gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-19 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/10/18 Bob Breuer : >> Kai Tietz wrote: >>> 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer : >>>> Richard Henderson wrote: >>>>> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote: >>>>>> Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-24 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: > Hi, > > For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x > and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate > that easy between ms- and sysv-abi. > > But could somebody give this patch a try? > > Regards, > Kai > > ChangeLog > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp

2011-10-25 Thread Bob Breuer
Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/10/24 Bob Breuer : >> Kai Tietz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x >>> and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate >>> that eas