On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:32:38 Andrew Haley wrote:
> ... a little tip. Add this to your c-mode-hook:
>
>(set-variable 'show-trailing-whitespace t)
>
> And you'll see all the trailing whitespace. On my system it appears
> bright red.
>
Doesn't seem to work on xemacs :(
Andrew Walrond
-m32)?
Andrew Walrond
On Monday 02 May 2005 13:01, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> Simple question, but I'm not entirely clear from reading the documentation
Anyone? Pretty please? (a ghastly pleading phrase, which is used by some
really strange people in an attempt to have another do something they are
relu
Thanks Ian; much appreciated.
Andrew Walrond
ons -fdata-sections -c
../../../../gcc-3.3.6/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/guard.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o guard.o
xgcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations
make[4]: *** [guard.lo] Error 1
Thanks
Andrew Walrond
On Sunday 28 August 2005 16:06, Kean Johnston wrote:
> Andrew Walrond wrote:
> > Can anybody explain what this error might mean?
> >
> > /tmp/gcc-3-3.heretix/work/gcc/xgcc "" -B/tmp/gcc-3-3.heretix/work/gcc/
>
> ^^^
>
&g
kernel; sed (and sometimes
other tools like rm) crashes randomly during build when running newer
kernel... (same .config, vanilla untainted kernels)
I'm going to chase this down on LKML now. Sorry for the noise
Andrew Walrond
. I tripped over
that, only realising my mistake when the expected tarball was no where to be
seen on the ftp server...
So I can only agree that the wording is a little ambiguous.
Andrew Walrond
I've tried two mirrors with the same results:
$ cat md5.sum | grep gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2
d3338b75fa6f83be08908b1eed56d439 gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2
$ md5sum gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2
cc3c5565fdb9ab87a05ddb106ba0bd1f gcc-4.3.3.tar.bz2
Can someone confirm/fix this?
Thanks!
Andrew Walrond
putting any more effort into developing and
supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain?
[Apologies for slightly off-topic post]
Andrew Walrond
f
they would rather we used Solaris), but it eludes me completely.
Andrew Walrond
David Miller wrote:
>
> That's correct, it's essentially GCC's language front ends
> plugged into Sun's compiler backend.
> -
And presumably is solaris only doesn't work under gnu/linux?
Andrew Walrond
and linux kernel as
part of that deal?
Andrew Walrond
Andrew Walrond wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> That's correct, it's essentially GCC's language front ends
>> plugged into Sun's compiler backend.
>> -
>
> And presumably is solaris only doesn't work under gnu/linux?
>
Sorry; that is think
ch is
competitive (for some useful workloads) and they are only serious about
supporting their increasingly niche Solaris OS? Go figure.
Andrew Walrond
David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100
>
>> So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
>
> That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
> say this, it isn&#
DB before being
> hired by Sun), but my current work is completely unrelated to compiler
> toolchain issues. (Other than as a user!) And I have no particular
> influence on Sun's resource allocation or open source behavior.
And I apologise (to everyone) for any unnecessary rhetoric on my part; I
freely admit that I designed my posts specifically to sparc (ahem) this
debate, but I guess most of you knew that already ;)
Andrew Walrond
g sir; I shall trouble you no more...
[Although, if you could just get the sparc64 kernel compiling properly
with gcc4.2+ when you get a minute...] ;)
Andrew Walrond
r competitors are listening. Some of them are woefully
inadequate in this regard.
Andrew Walrond
ers. The politics are unfortunately as important as the development
details in this game, if we want a strong and vital toolchain
development community.
But rest assured that I am sensitive to the purpose of the list and I
promise; no more off-topic posts from me for at least a couple of months :)
20 matches
Mail list logo
