Hi,
I am seeing an address error exception caused by the gcc optimizer -O1.
I have narrowed it down to the following function:
static void varcopy(PVAR *pvar1, PVAR *pvar2) {
memcpy(pvar1,pvar2,sizeof(PVAR));
}
Being the sizeof(PVAR) 160 bytes.
The exception is caused on an sd instruction
esn't happen.
Also, if I do
static void varcopy(void *pvar1, void *pvar2)
the compiler uses sdl and avoids the crash.
I am compiling for n32 ABI, so the register size is 64bits.
Any ideas?
On 8/9/07, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Gonzalez wrote:
> > Hi,
>
his will cause gcc to pad this entry
out to ensure that it starts on an 8 byte boundary.
Does this make sense?
Alex
On 8/9/07, Alex Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll try to come up with a short test.
>
> I have narrowed it a bit more. The PVAR structure
