Hi all,
i must use cfg library to build and manipulate a control flow graph. I have
read more but i have not found an answer to my question: It is possible to
build a cfg structure directly from a file .cfg ?? How i can building a cfg
from a file??
Thanks to all,
lastnote
Hello,
I have a RCM3400 Rabbitcore and I must create a client with this
circuit. I have created a C# file with Visual Studio but I need a
Dynamic C file ( or C file) to program the Rabbit. Then,I must
translate this in Dynamic C language.
How can I do?
BYE.
Naviga e telefona senza limiti c
blitzen:/home/jonatha/packages/gcc-3.4.5$ config.guess
powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0
blitzen:/home/jonatha/packages/gcc-3.4.5$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
/home/jonatha/build/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/3.4.5/specs
Configured with: ./configure --with-as=/usr/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/bin-ld --disable
gt; ---Original Message---
> From: sdutta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Auto Vectorizing help needed
> Sent: 24 Feb '07 00:13
>
> I am targeting GCC 4.1.1 to a custom RISC processor; which has some vector
> instructions (32 bit vectors). It can perform two 1
Is it time to offer "second-strap" level of compilation? Ie allow C99 to
bootstrap the creation of a basic GCC compiler, then allow a second compile
using the basic GCC compiler to get the full compiler.
Nick
> ---Original Message---
> From: Paul Brook <[EMAIL PRO
Message---
> From: DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: core changes for mep port
> Sent: 16 Mar '07 03:09
>
>
> > Do you mean where is the best place to call these functions?
>
> Yup.
>
> > Look at the calls to cgraph_mark_ed
Singhania
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Singhania
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a fictitious machine which has a word size of 8-bits but can handle
16-bit adds and 16-bit mov's. I am trying to build the most efficient support
for handling an addsi3 insn. My problem is that if I try to split up the
addsi3 insn into a couple of addhi3 insns (using a define_expand tem
Hello, I'm trying to compile a simple program with gcc on windows and am
getting really frustrated. I've tried entering the commands in command
prompt (no ms-dos mode, I have XP) and Run, but can't get anything,
mostly something like "no such directory" or "gcc is not a valid
command". Any sugg
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Sent: Monday, Jul 9, 2005 5:14 PM
To: Olga
Cc: Vera
Subject: wow, check this out !
http://teeny.servehttp.com/
Dear Sirs,
1. bootstrapping the gcc 4.0.1 under Sparc/Solaris I found that the
building in "fixincludes" uses the gcc (with no PATH specification)
instead of the xgcc build by the last stage. It may crash, it happens on
my environment, because I've migrated from Solaris 9 to Solaris 10 where
-Original Message-
From: jacky
Sent: Monday, Aug 20, 2005 5:14 PM
To: Amelie
Cc: Vera, Chris
Subject: wow !
http://optimum.atw.hu
Hi,
I know that some people are working on a GCC port for Minix v3, but
I'd like to work on a cross-compiler for my own purposes. I'd like
the host and build to be i686-pc-linux-gnu, and the target to be
i[3456]86-pc-minix3.
Can anyone give me some advice on where to begin and what info I need?
> Well, as far as I have seen, most of the internals are documented in the
> code itself. The best way to learn how it works, in my opinion, is to get
> a good code cross-reference tool. The files you mostly want to look at are
> in gcc/config in a build tree.
>
> Good luck and have fun,
> Jonathan
On 10/20/05, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe a good place to get clues is to look at how GCC and binutils are
> > built for DOS, e.g. DJGPP. (I've asked DJ for some help).
>
> Except that DJGPP uses COFF, not a.out. DJGPP v1 used a.out, but
Hello,
We just bought a HP Integrity Itanium server and are running VMS 8.2.
Does a Gnu C-compiler exist ?
Best regards,
Sincerely,
Rudy Campe
Annabel Textiles
Belgium - Europe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all.
I have read the gcc-summit 2005 publication from Eric Botcaczou, Cyrille
Comar and Oliver Hainque about static stack analysis.
This is a quite interresting approach, especially for embedded systems.
While reading the article i saw many talking about ada but not for C.
Is the patch
site located in Russia, Moscow. The path to archive is:
http://zcontest.ru/gcc.php
P.S. Looks like, currently, it's the only archive in Russia.
--
Best Regards,
Roman Solovyev mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
MEM3745-256D,
MEM1841-256D,
MEM180X-256D,
WS-X6K-MSFC2-KIT,
and so on.
¡¡
Regards
Helen.Zhou
www.nstnetwork.com
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL helenxuezhou
Icq 320-880-606
,
MEM2600XM-64D,
MEM-S1-128MB,
MEM-S2-256MB,
MEM-S2-512MB,
MEM-MSFC-128MB,
MEM2801-256D,
MEM3800-256D,
MEM3800-512,
MEM3745-256D,
MEM1841-256D,
MEM180X-256D,
WS-X6K-MSFC2-KIT,
and so on.
Regards
Helen.Zhou
NEWSTAR NETWORKING TECHNOLOGY
www.nstnetwork.com
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email
Hello.
We have set up a new mirror. This is our information:
URL:
- http://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/gcc/
- ftp://mirror-fpt-telecom.fpt.net/mirror/gcc/
Location:
- Company: FPT Telecom
- City: HoChiMinh
- Country: Viet Nam
Contact:
- Name: Minh Vu Tong
- email: [EMAIL
letter, un blog,vous vendez sur internet etc...
vous devez utiliser un logiciel d'emailing
performant pour au moins doubler vos ventes!
http://url-ok.com/6648dd
Tester gratuitement les avantages de ce logiciel,
en vous renseignant à cette page:
http://url-ok.com/6648dd
Bien cordialeme
le-erotica@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/female-erotica
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
mi-Couples@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Miami-Couples
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
test message. delete before reading.
Ben White
Este correo ha sido cambiado, favor enviar a:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gracias
Holen sie sich jetzt 2400 EUR in Cash ab
Und gehen Sie dabei einen sicheren und koeniglichen Weg !!!
Alles mehrsprachig und einfach erklaert, starten Sie jetzt !!!
Für jeden erhaeltlich, ganz einfach: Anklicken, Registrieren, abholen !!!
WO ERHALTEN SIE SONST 2400 Euro in 12 Monaten aufgeteil
Hallo gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
dieses ist nun schon unsere 2. Mail an Sie, da wir nicht moechten, dass
Ihnen die für Sie reservierten 2400,00 EUR verloren gehen.
Ja tatsaechlich, dieser Betrag ist für Sie als Inhaber der Email
gcc@gcc.gnu.org reserviert
Greifen sie jetzt zu und holen sie sich jetzt 2
lly load code. In the Ptolemy project
(http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/) we were doing that in 1990:
we could define new classes and load them into a running application,
without restarting.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:33:16AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a thread safe operation fo
found here:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+how+it+works.
I hope you will find worthy the reading.
In case of questions do not hesitate to ask.
Yours sincerely,
George.
Olivier Galibert ?:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:49:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTEC
Oliver.
Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials?
If yes, what do you think on it?
Yours sincerely,
George.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?:
Thank you for your reply, Oliver.
Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks
like this:
1. take a loot at the first
ers having
largely moved on by the time it was merged. Not an excuse, just a
statement that there was not a clean handoff to a new maintainer.
I recall that the original port being using binutils 2.7 so that
gives a timeframe.
R.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Deve
Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 00:30, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Joe Buck wrote:
But if it won't even build, then users should be warned.
I suppose -- but we have relatively many configurations that probably
won't build, at le
Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Attached are the patches for coldfire v4e. These
changes are originally contributed by Peter Barada. I
have migrated and tested these changes from gcc 3.04
to gcc 3.4 and now to mainline.
Since coldfire v4e has MMU we need to support
m68k-linux target for coldfire
ibrary patch.
Thanks,
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
Peter Barada wrote:
Well, yes. 1 second/file is still slow! I want "make" to complete
instantaneously! Don't you?
Actually I want it to complete before I even start, but I don't want
to get too greedy. :)
What's really sad is that for cross-compilation of the toolchain, we
have to repeat a few
This is really getting pretty far from the original topic but
I am diving in anyway.
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 02:53, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 00:10 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 23:43, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 10:42 -0
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
* I wasn't aware about this fortran specific patch posting policy. I
never have sent any gcc patch to any other list but gcc-patches for
approval before, so I also had not done so this time.
* How could I know t
Joe Buck wrote:
I used to be an embedded programmer myself, and while I cared very much
about the size and speed of the embedded code I wound up with, I didn't
care at all about being able to run the compiler itself on a machine that
wasn't reasonably up to date, much less trying to bootstrap the c
Karel Gardas wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 17, 2005, Karel Gardas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you see that 4.0 added "embedded" platforms like arm-none-elf and
mips-none-elf to the primary platforms list.
These are only embedded targets. You can'
Peter Barada wrote:
Yes, but Ralf was complaining about embedded cross-compiling development
for RTEMS. I have not tried to reply to Peter Barada who complains about
GCC inablity to be run on embedded targets directly.
Logically Peter's situation is the same as the NetBSD issue with
building and
.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
I'm happy to anounce that Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as the new m68k port maintainer.
I, for one, thank him and wish him well in this effort. :)
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications
Geoffrey Keating wrote:
"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geoffrey Keating) writes:
* gcc.c: Include xregex.h.
(version_compare_spec_function): New.
(spec_function): Add
Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
Mark Mitchell wrote:
The GCC 4.0.2 RC3 prerelease is spinning now.
If all goes well, it will be available later today.
From an RTEMS perspective, 4.0.2RC2 with no patches appeared to
be at least as good as 4.0.1 w/RTEMS patches. I spotted no
new issues. I built a native C, C++, and Ada compi
is easily accessible.
In spite of the pain, a dot release is probably the safest thing all
around.
Sorry this happened. I can sympathize with your pain. :(
Matthias
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applicatio
y this person does.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2004-November/017632.html
Or to just use the Linux emulation and run the Linux RTEMS tools.
Thanks
Fred
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Resear
to be the same.
Thanks
Fred
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
Or at least I think it's the head. I am still learning subversion. :)
I am testing using gcc-head-test with the *-rtems targets. I managed
to build a native compiler and am using that to build the cross
compilers. But when the build gets around to trying to build newlib, it
is using CC=${ta
tatus.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
+
| 4.1.0 20051102 (experimental) (mips-unknown-rtems4.7) GCC error: |
| tree check: expected class |
| Error detected at a-calend.adb:480:24
Advice, patches always appreciated.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL P
added it above the function db() around line 230.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
rill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 17:43 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to build sparc-rtems4.7 on the head using newlib's
head for a few days now. I have finally narrowed the behavior down.
If I configure
(const_int 1 [0x1])) [5 S2 A8])
(reg:HI 24 r24)) 12 {*movhi} (nil)
(nil))
../../../../../../gcc-head-test/newlib/libc/misc/init.c:59: internal
compiler error: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:1890
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EM
Arnaud Charlet wrote:
How many of such platforms are available and known to work in the FSF
tree?
Strange question. The answer is all the platforms currently known to
work with Ada (too many to be listed here).
One alternative is to have an s-auxdec-empty and use that
on platforms where s-a
As of this morning, Ada no longer compiles for *-rtems.
I think this change broke it.
2005-11-14 Thomas Quinot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* socket.c (__gnat_get_h_errno): New function to retrieve h_errno, the
hosts database last error code.
RTEMS has networking functions but they a
Is this valid C or C++? I am getting a syntax error when
compiled as C++ but not C.
int f()
{
int x, y, ;
}
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsvill
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Is this valid C or C++? I am getting a syntax error when
compiled as C++ but not C.
int f()
{
int x, y, ;
}
I am getting a syntax error with the C front-end but not with the
C++ front-end. This is definitely a bug as this is invalid C++ also.
This is a regression from
yesterday afternoon, binutils 2.16.1 and
newlib 1.13.0.
I can file a PR but this is definitely a recent breakage.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Hunts
Thomas Quinot wrote:
* Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2005-11-16 :
RTEMS has networking functions but they are not available at this stage
during the build.
I am not sure I understand how this can happen (I am not familiar at all
with the RTEMS build process). If the network fun
Mark Mitchell wrote:
The number of open serious regressions against 4.1 is a respectable 87,
quite a few of which are P3s, waiting for me to categorize them. We
still have some work to do before the release, but we will branch on
2005-11-18, as previously announced, at some point late Friday eve
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:14 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
+ No PR - The Ada tools mangle target names like arm-rtems4.7.
Apparently they don't like the version part. Laurent is working on
this.
To be accurate I promised to work on this once Paolo configure
patch is
Thomas Quinot wrote:
* Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2005-11-17 :
I hope the explanation above helps make it clearer.
Yes, thanks for the clarification. In light of this explanation the
proposed fix seems appropriate; maybe a comment could be added along
with the extern declarat
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 17:14 +0100, Frédéric PRACA wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to build an Ada cross compiler for ARM using the arm-rtems
target. I tried with GCC 4.0.2 and subversion-version but I failed.
What should I know to do this knowing that I already built the C
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 12:15 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
arm-rtems4.7 does build C, C++, and Ada on the gcc SVN head. I have
done no testing beyond that.
Is there a simulator for arm? Frederic do you have a testing
environment in mind? What "--enable-rtemsbsp=X" should
Frédéric PRACA wrote:
Selon Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 12:15 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
arm-rtems4.7 does build C, C++, and Ada on the gcc SVN head. I have
done no testing beyond that.
Is there a simulator for arm? Frederic do you have a t
-head-test/
--enable-languages=c,c++,ada
Is this a known failure?
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256)
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 04:34:17PM -0600, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
My fresh check out on the head build using the gcc shipped with
Fedora Core 4 has failed for the past couple of days with this error:
A day and half.
Is this a known failure?
. 2005-07-28
Assigns past and future changes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANY SuSe Prague 2005-07-26
Disclaims all past interest and for 5 years from the date of the
disclaimer, in changes made to free software by Tomas Bily.
The country appears to be wrong (since I believe you are Czec
. 2005-07-28
Assigns past and future changes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANY SuSe Prague 2005-07-26
Disclaims all past interest and for 5 years from the date of the
disclaimer, in changes made to free software by Tomas Bily.
The country appears to be wrong (since I believe you are Czec
using
-mrelocatable
==
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Avail
David Edelsohn wrote:
"Joel Sherrill writes:
Joel> With code updated this morning, powerpc-rtems fails to build. I am
Joel> using binutils 2.16.1 with just a couple of patches.
Joel> Is this a gcc or binutils error? Is there a known fix?
This is not a known problem. There have b
Hello Nic,
Thank you for contributing to GNU software. We'll send you the appropriate
papers through the post Please sign and return the original in the envelope
provided. Once the FSF has signed it, we will send you a digital copy in pdf
format for your records.
If your employment status cha
Dave Korn wrote:
On 22 January 2008 14:06, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
I note the lack of anyone posting test results for
uClinux, OpenBSD or RTEMS, and suggest that users of those operating
systems should try to post test results for at least some target
architectures.
Sorry. For RTE
on them
(for whatever reason), but meanwhile, does that count against
deprecation?
Anyone sending results for a target counts against deprecation. I didn't
even look at what version the results are for (although maybe in the 4.4
cycle we should only look at results for 4.3 or later).
--
Joseph S. Myers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
79 matches
Mail list logo
