Canceled event with note: Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain @ Thu Dec 26, 2024 11am - 12pm (EST) (gcc@gcc.gnu.org)

2024-09-24 Thread Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
This event has been canceled with a note: "Removing due to Holidays!" Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain Thursday Dec 26, 2024 ⋅ 11am – 12pm Eastern Time - New York Location https://bbb.linuxfoundation.org/room/adm-xcb-for-sk6 https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbbb.linuxfoundation.or

RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain

2024-09-24 Thread Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
> From: Joseph Myers > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 12:43 AM > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2024, Jiang, Haochen via Gcc wrote: > > Where projects have existing pre-commit CI that puts CI results in > patchwork based on patches processed there, I hope such CI would be > updated to work with pull requ

Re: [PATCH] Update email in MAINTAINERS file.

2024-09-24 Thread Filip Kastl
On Mon 2024-09-23 09:43:28, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > From: Aldy Hernandez > > ChangeLog: > > * MAINTAINERS: Update email and add myself to DCO. > --- > MAINTAINERS | 9 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index cfd96c9f3

Re: [PATCH] Update email in MAINTAINERS file.

2024-09-24 Thread Filip Kastl
On Tue 2024-09-24 11:43:47, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Pushed attached patch. > > Thanks. > Aldy > Nice. Thanks! Filip > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:09 AM Filip Kastl wrote: > > > On Mon 2024-09-23 09:43:28, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > From: Aldy Hernandez > > > > > > ChangeLog: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] Update email in MAINTAINERS file.

2024-09-24 Thread Aldy Hernandez
Pushed attached patch. Thanks. Aldy On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 10:09 AM Filip Kastl wrote: > On Mon 2024-09-23 09:43:28, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > From: Aldy Hernandez > > > > ChangeLog: > > > > * MAINTAINERS: Update email and add myself to DCO. > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 9 + > > 1

Re: spelling of `side effects` vs `side-effects`

2024-09-24 Thread David Brown via Gcc
On 23/09/2024 22:09, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote: While working on the review from https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/663418.html . I noticed that there are places which use `side effects` and some use `side-effects`. I assume we should follow a similar pattern as `back-end`

Re: Raise nvptx code generation to default PTX ISA 7.3, sm_52, therefore CUDA 11.3 (released 2021-04)

2024-09-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2024-09-23T09:22:55+0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 6:50 PM Thomas Schwinge > wrote: >> (This is orthogonal to yesterday's >> "GCC 15: nvptx '-mptx=3.1' multilib variants are deprecated".) >> >> We'd like to raise nvptx code generation from PTX ISA 6.0, sm_30 "Keple

RE: On pull request workflows for the GNU toolchain

2024-09-24 Thread Joseph Myers via Gcc
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024, Jiang, Haochen via Gcc wrote: > I am running regression tests on x86_64 and sending the regressions to > gcc-regression mailing thread, will I need to send to another place or > using another API to do that? I don't expect use of pull requests to change anything about existin