Re: Second GCC 14.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-05-06 Thread Frank Scheiner via Gcc
Bootstrapping the following configuration (with LRA enabled) looks good for ia64, too: ``` CFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" \ CXXFLAGS="-O2 -fPIC" \ ../configure --prefix=/usr \ --enable-obsolete \ --libdir=/usr/lib \ --mandir=/usr/man \ --infodir=/usr/info \ --enable-shared \ --enable-bootstrap \ --enable-lan

Re: Second GCC 14.1 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org

2024-05-06 Thread Iain Sandoe via Gcc
> On 3 May 2024, at 21:57, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > The second release candidate for GCC 14.1 is available from > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14.1.0-RC-20240503/ > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14.1.0-RC-20240503/ > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated

Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans

2024-05-06 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 08:22:12 +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > On 04/05/2024 22.56, Ben Boeckel via Overseers wrote: > > As a fellow FOSS maintainer I definitely appreciate the benefit of being > > email-based (`mutt` is far better at wrangling notifications from > > umpteen places than…well basical

Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

2024-05-06 Thread Toon Moene
I have now, for some time, ran LAPACK's test programs on my gcc/gfortran builds on both on the x86_64-linux-gnu architecture, as well as the aarch64-linux-gnu one (see, e.g., http://moene.org/~toon/lapack-amd64-gfortran13-O3). The results are rather alarming - this is r15-202 for aarch64 vs r1

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

2024-05-06 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 2:27 PM Toon Moene wrote: > > I have now, for some time, ran LAPACK's test programs on my gcc/gfortran > builds on both on the x86_64-linux-gnu architecture, as well as the > aarch64-linux-gnu one (see, e.g., > http://moene.org/~toon/lapack-amd64-gfortran13-O3). > > The resu

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

2024-05-06 Thread Toon Moene
On 5/6/24 23:32, Andrew Pinski wrote: Did you test x86_64 with -march=native (or with -mfma) or just -O3? The reason why I am asking is aarch64 includes FMA by default while x86_64 does not. Most recent x86_64 includes an FMA instruction but since the base ISA does not include it, it is not enab

Re: Tests of gcc development beyond its testsuite (in this case, for gfortran)

2024-05-06 Thread Toon Moene
On 5/6/24 23:35, Toon Moene wrote: On 5/6/24 23:32, Andrew Pinski wrote: Did you test x86_64 with -march=native (or with -mfma) or just -O3? The reason why I am asking is aarch64 includes FMA by default while x86_64 does not. Most recent x86_64 includes an FMA instruction but since the base IS