On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most
> will still be under 400K and I wouldn't raise the limit (because most
> such larger emails are really just spam). But we might want to get
> more mailinglist moderators.
>
> gcc-
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gdb wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> > wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most
> > will still be under 400K and I wouldn't raise the limit (because most
> > such larger
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 15:02 Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gdb wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> > > wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most
> > > will still be under 400K
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, 15:02 Mark Wielaard, wrote:
> > The jit mailinglist is the same. It only has one moderator
> > (David). Having a second/backup one would probably be nice. Are you ok
> > to be added there?
>
> Sur
Snapshot gcc-14-20240407 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20240407/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sunday 07 January 2024 02:55:09 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello, I would like to remind that the first gcc bug from the list in
> previous email has not received any comment yet. It is this one:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108849
> Do you need some more details, or something else fo
