Re: Question about merging if-else blocks

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:21 AM Hanke Zhang via Gcc wrote: > > Thanks! I understand what you mean, then can I think that if the > function here is not an external function, but a function visible to > the compiler and the function doesn't modify `a`, then these two > blocks can be merged? Yes. T

Re: Report from the additional type errors for GCC 14 BoF at Cauldron

Hello, I apologise for this problem, but I've been recieving emails regarding the project you are working on. However, I'm unable to understand the context of this project. But it looks exciting! I would be thankful if you can help me through the project framework, and share the exact details, so

After Cauldron - online mini BoFs and Fosdem

Hi all, Cauldron was really great. Seeing everybody in person again. One item that came up was about meeting more frequently and/or in smaller (virtual) groups. If people want to have online mini BoFs to follow up on some discussion they had at Cauldron, or for some periodic meetup, then please r

Re: School District Contact - 2023

Hi there, We are excited to offer you a comprehensive email list of school districts that includes key contact information such as phone numbers, email addresses, mailing addresses, company revenue, size, and web addresses. Our databases also cover related industries such as: * K-12 schools

Re: seek advice about GCC learning

On 26/09/2023 08:48, weizhe wang via Gcc wrote: Thanks for your reply. Is there some guide for building rv32 cross compiler gcc ? I encounter some error in the building progress. You might find useful information here:

Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

Hi all, During the GNU Tools Cauldron we discussed (at the BoF: IPA & LTO) the possibility (and hazards) of building the run time libraries for various compilers with -flto, enabling an -flto -static linking of programs with the run time library available during link time optimizations. Toda

GCC workshop at university

Hi everyone, I'm in my final MSc year and figured after this weekend's Q&A that I could replicate David's workshop on a smaller scale within my university. Would that be doable/acceptable ? Is there any need for special licensing ? What about uploading the session's recording afterwards ? To Dav

Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

On 9/27/23 12:21, Toon Moene wrote: The lto-ing of libgfortran did succeed, because I did get a new warning: gfortran -O3 -flto -flto-partition=none -static  -o xlintstrfz zchkrfp.o zdrvrfp.o zdrvrf1.o zdrvrf2.o zdrvrf3.o zdrvrf4.o zerrrfp.o zlatb4.o zlaipd.o zlarhs.o zsbmv.o zget04.o zpo

Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

Hi Toon, During the GNU Tools Cauldron we discussed (at the BoF: IPA & LTO) the possibility (and hazards) of building the run time libraries for various compilers with -flto, enabling an -flto -static linking of programs with the run time library available during link time optimizations. Thi

Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:48 PM Jeff Law via Fortran wrote: > > > > On 9/27/23 12:21, Toon Moene wrote: > > > > > The lto-ing of libgfortran did succeed, because I did get a new warning: > > > > gfortran -O3 -flto -flto-partition=none -static -o xlintstrfz zchkrfp.o > > zdrvrfp.o zdrvrf1.o zdrvr

Re: Test with an lto-build of libgfortran.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:28 PM Richard Biener via Fortran wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:48 PM Jeff Law via Fortran > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9/27/23 12:21, Toon Moene wrote: > > > > > > > > The lto-ing of libgfortran did succeed, because I did get a new warning: > > > > > > gfortran -