The GNU Compiler Collection version 11.4 has been released.
GCC 11.4 is the first bug-fix release from the GCC 11 branch containing
important fixes for regressions and serious bugs in GCC 11.3 with more
than 110 bugs fixed since the previous release.
This release is available from the WWW servers
Hi,
Regstrapping finally done for PR109439 - Spurious
-Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value tagging along
-Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds.
Now only a OOB warning is reported when necessary instead of OOB + Use
of uninitialized value.
Some tests in analyzer (out-of-bounds-*, realloc-5, pr101962) were
che
Hi everyone,
Quick note that it seems like the freshly updated docs for GCC 11.4 seem to be
hitting a 404 error when attempting to access them.
Links that 404 for me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.4.0/gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.4.0/libquadmath/
quick way to get there
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 02:50:06PM +, Felix LeClair via Gcc wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Quick note that it seems like the freshly updated docs for GCC 11.4 seem to
> be hitting a 404 error when attempting to access them.
>
> Links that 404 for me:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.
"Andrew Pinski" wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 3:54 PM Stefan Kanthak
> wrote:
>> Nevertheless GCC fails to optimise code properly:
>>
>> --- .c ---
>> int ispowerof2(unsigned long long argument) {
>> return __builtin_popcountll(argument) == 1;
>> }
>> --- EOF ---
>>
>> GCC 13.3gcc -
On Sun, 28 May 2023 15:50:41 +0800
Julian Waters via Gcc wrote:
> Man, these clang fanboys sure are getting out of hand
Strange reasoning you've used here. Is this sort of like how if I'm against
Donald Trump, then I must be for Hillary Clinton, or vice versa?
That's called a "false dichotomy"
Snapshot gcc-14-20230529 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20230529/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On May 17, 2023, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> ISTR Alexandre Oliva (CC added) mentioning leveraging GDB to implement
> various bits of LSP functionality, such as handling multiple TUs. This
> sounds like a good idea to me (at least at a high level), as it could
> lead to the hypothetical GNU toolcha
On 5/29/23 15:01, Dave Blanchard wrote:
He's certainly got a few things wrong from time to time in his zeal, but his overall
point seems to stand. Do you have any rebuttals of his argument to present yourself? Or
do you prefer to just sit back and wait on "y'all" to do the heavy lifting?
He'
"There's your first mistake. Hint: people who are able to hand deconstruct
the output of a compiler's code generator and point out exactly how
instructions are wasted are never correctly referred to as an "idiot", in
the context of computer programming at least."
gdb -batch -ex 'set disassembly-fl
10 matches
Mail list logo
