Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
An optimization flag that I recently added is being set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.) The flag defined like this: finterleaving-index-32-bits Common Var(flag_interleaving_index_32_bits) Init(0) Optimization Structure reorganization

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/7/22 09:10, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: An optimization flag that I recently added is being set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.) Question is: what's the value of the flag in your IPA pass if you set -finterleaving-index-32-bits?

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Martin, Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... Gary From: Martin Liška Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:20 AM To: Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Issue

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your emails any longer. I don't want to follow the condition

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gabriel Ravier via Gcc
On 1/7/22 09:38, Martin Liška wrote: On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your emails any longer

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
Gabriel, Yes, indeed, thank you. Note, it is a reminder to those that are receiving proprietary and that is considered as a legal obligation on the part of the company transmitting it because they must make an effort to protect their proprietary information. I'm not a lawyer either but I feel li

Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc subdirectory and 160 if we also count those in (non-testsuite) subdirectories, while the

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc
Martin Jambor writes: > Hi, > > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? > > We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc > subdirectory and 160 if we also count those in (non-t

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 2:35 AM Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote: > > Martin Jambor writes: > > Hi, > > > > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? > > > > We already have 47 files with suffi

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 10:26, Martin Jambor wrote: > I have already missed stuff when grepping because I did not include *.cc > files and the inconsistency is also just ugly and must be very confusing > to anyone who encounters it for the first time. Yes, and it affects tooling like syntax highligh

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:25:50AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? > > We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc > subdirectory and 160

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 10:54, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > My big worry would be backporting for the next 2 years. > Do we need to adjust commit messages when backporting to replace *.cc with > *.c in there? Does git cherry-pick handle the changed files or do we > need to resolve conflicts manua

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/7/22 12:05, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: References to .cc files in the commit message won't get changed to .c automatically, but maybe the gcc-backport alias could be taught to do that. Hi. +1 for me. I'm willing to extend gcc-backport script to support renaming files in the commit mes

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Iain Sandoe via Gcc
> On 7 Jan 2022, at 12:55, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 1/7/22 12:05, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: >> References to .cc files in the commit message won't get changed to .c >> automatically, but maybe the gcc-backport alias could be taught to do >> that. > +1 for me. I'm willing to extend gcc-

Stackpath

2022-01-07 Thread Shirley Falk
Good Day, I would like to know if you are interested in reaching out to Stackpath?. We specialize in the Tech information database. If you prefer any other Tech information database, we can assist. Our data assists businesses like yours to connect potential customers through email, phone or dir

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 1/7/2022 3:25 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: Hi, Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc subdirectory and 160 if we also count tho

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 1/7/2022 7:49 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 1/7/2022 3:25 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: Hi, Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc s

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hi, > > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc > suffix? > > We already have 47 files with suffix .cc directly in the gcc > subdirectory and

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 16:00, David Malcolm wrote: > Presumably the generated files should also change from .c to .cc (e.g. > gengtype generates a gtype-desc.c which is actually C++). We could do that separately (and right away), couldn't we? That could even have been done back in the subversion da

Re: GCC GSoC 2022: Call for project ideas and mentors

2022-01-07 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 17:20 +0100, Martin Jambor wrote: > Hello, > > another year is upon us and Google has announced there will be again > Google Summer of Code 2022 (though AFAIK there is no specific timeline > yet).  I'd like to volunteer to be the main Org Admin for GCC again so > let me know

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Alexandre Oliva via Gcc
On Jan 7, 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? I wouldn't mind that. > (Any important caveats I might have missed?) Having recently renamed a .c source to

Re: Mass rename of C++ .c files to .cc suffix?

2022-01-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:33:54PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc wrote: > On Jan 7, 2022, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > Would anyone be terribly against mass renaming all *.c files (that are > > actually C++ files) within the gcc subdirectory to ones with .cc suffix? > > I wouldn't mind that. >

Re: Why doesn't this pattern match?

2022-01-07 Thread Andras Tantos
Thanks for the help, that's exactly it! Andras On Thu, 2022-01-06 at 20:25 -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 8:13 PM Andras Tantos > wrote: > > Hello! > > > > My name is Andras Tantos and I just joined this list, so if I'm > > asking > > something off-topic or not following t

[gen-14164] Invitation to the CERT Vendor Meeting 2022

2022-01-07 Thread cert+donotreply--- via Gcc
We invite you to join us for the CERT Vendor Meeting 2022. This will be a virtual event, 2022-02-07 10:00-14:30 EST, via Zoom Webinar. We'll be discussing two topics in some depth, using an extended panel format (short presentations, moderated discussion, open discussion). Topic 1: Log4j, a mul

Re: [gen-14164] Invitation to the CERT Vendor Meeting 2022

2022-01-07 Thread Toon Moene
On 1/7/22 21:14, cert+donotreply--- via Gcc wrote: Topic 2: There's no such thing as free software, or, how to invest in OSS security. Wasn't this Cygnus motto: "We make free software affordable ?" Kind regards, -- Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14,

Help with an ABI peculiarity

2022-01-07 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Folks, In the aarch64 Darwin ABI we have an unusual (OK, several unusual) feature of the calling convention. When an argument is passed *in a register* and it is integral and less than SI it is promoted (with appropriate signedness) to SI. This applies when the function parm is named only.

Re: Help with an ABI peculiarity

2022-01-07 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc
> On Jan 7, 2022, at 4:06 PM, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > In the aarch64 Darwin ABI we have an unusual (OK, several unusual) feature of > the calling convention. > > When an argument is passed *in a register* and it is integral and less than > SI it is promoted (with appropriate s

gcc-10-20220107 is now available

2022-01-07 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-10-20220107 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10-20220107/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 10 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch