Hi, all.
Please CC me when I am mentioned into a mail.
On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 15:16 +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files?
Snapshot gcc-11-20210612 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20210612/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Sent from my MacBook Air
Hi all,
While moving the simple A CMP 0 ? A : -A patterns from
fold_cond_expr_with_comparison to match, I ran into an issue where
using cond directly in the patterns work while "for cnd (cond
vec_cond)" don't work.
It looks like in the first case we are able to correctly handle the
cond first ope
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 4:54 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> While moving the simple A CMP 0 ? A : -A patterns from
> fold_cond_expr_with_comparison to match, I ran into an issue where
> using cond directly in the patterns work while "for cnd (cond
> vec_cond)" don't work.
> It looks like
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 5:21 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 4:54 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > While moving the simple A CMP 0 ? A : -A patterns from
> > fold_cond_expr_with_comparison to match, I ran into an issue where
> > using cond directly in the patterns
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:39 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > I was wondering where can we send a patch to add binutils (latest )
> > to that docker hub image
>
> Those images are maintained by Docker Inc. and nothing to do with the
> GCC project:
>
> https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/official_ima
