Re: GSoC 2021 - Fortran run-time argument checking

2021-04-06 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Krishna, On 03.04.21 13:52, Krishna Kariya wrote: I am Krishna, a final-year undergraduate student from India. I am interested in the project “Fortran – run-time argument checking” for GSoC 2021. Please share some resources about the project. Please point to some issues or programming tasks t

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

2021-04-06 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:21 PM Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:08 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > > > Richard Biener pointed out dysfunction in the SC. The case of the > > missing question I asked in 2019 also points to that. This response > > gives me no confidence t

Re: Default debug format for AVR

2021-04-06 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 10:56 PM Simon Marchi via Gcc wrote: > > On 2021-04-05 3:36 p.m., Jim Wilson wrote:> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 6:24 PM > Simon Marchi via Gcc mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote: > > > > The default debug format (when using only -g) for the AVR target is > > stabs. Is ther

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

2021-04-06 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Richard, On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:21:01PM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > That's all true. It's still true that since GCC is a GNU project, formally > its maintainers are appointed by RMS (I've just read the official governance > structure document!). I think this is unfair to the st

GSoC 2021 Application - Mihnea Robert Gogu

2021-04-06 Thread Mihnea Gogu via Gcc
Dear reader, My name is Mihnea Robert Gogu and it is my pleasure to confirm my application for GSoC 2021, more specifically taking on a task as part of the gcc rust compiler. I am a second year Computing student at Imperial College London, most passionate about programming languages, by extension

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

2021-04-06 Thread Matthias Klose
On 4/6/21 12:27 PM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:21 PM Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:08 AM Nathan Sidwell wrote: >>> >>> Richard Biener pointed out dysfunction in the SC. The case of the >>> missing question I asked in 2019 also po

Re: Question about reading LTO function summaries

2021-04-06 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Fri, Mar 26 2021, Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote: > I already have some experience developing SIMPLE_IPA_PASSes, but I am > looking to understand IPA_PASSes better. I have made a hello world ipa > pass that stores "hello world $FUNCTION_NAME" in the function > summaries; however, I am having tro

Re: GSoC 2021 - Static analyzer project

2021-04-06 Thread Ankur Saini via Gcc
> On 30-Mar-2021, at 7:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> This gave rise to some questions >> >> 1. why does the analyzer make exceptions with the main() function ? > > The user's attention is important - we don't want to spam the user with > unnecessary reports if we can help it. make sense.

Re: GSoC 2021 - Static analyzer project

2021-04-06 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 17:56 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote: Hi Ankur. Various replies inline below throughout. > > On 30-Mar-2021, at 7:27 PM, David Malcolm > > wrote: > > > > This gave rise to some questions > > > > > > 1. why does the analyzer make exceptions with the main() function > > > ? > >

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

2021-04-06 Thread Siddhesh Poyarekar
On 4/6/21 3:57 PM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: Seeing the word "dysfunction" I don't remember using I want to clarify the non-openess which I intended to criticize. The SC is not "open" because: - it appoints itself (new members, that is) - in fact in theory it should be appointed by the FS

Re: Question about reading LTO function summaries

2021-04-06 Thread Erick Ochoa via Gcc
Hi Martin, thanks for taking some time to help me. I think I accidentally deleted the original hello world pass, but I have re-made it and I still have the same problem. I copy paste the patch at the bottom. Just to give some more context: I am running the following command: $PATH_TO_GCC/gcc -fi

Re: Remove RMS from the GCC Steering Committee

2021-04-06 Thread Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:28 AM Richard Biener wrote: > > Seeing the word "dysfunction" I don't remember using I want to clarify > the non-openess which I intended to criticize. The SC is not "open" because: > - it appoints itself (new members, that is) - in fact in theory it > should be appointed

Re: [GSoC-2021] Interested in project `Extend the static analysis pass`

2021-04-06 Thread Saloni Garg via Gcc
Hi, apologies for the delayed reply. I was having some college commitments. On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:22 PM David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 21:41 +0530, Saloni Garg wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:42 PM David Malcolm > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 16:06 +0530, Salo

GCC association with the FSF

2021-04-06 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Lets change the subject now that this is about GCC and the FSF. On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:46:29PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > Probably unintentionally, but he has allowed the GNU Project to become > a nasty cult of personality. The FSF seems to be imploding (with mass > resignati

Re: GCC association with the FSF

2021-04-06 Thread Christopher Dimech via Gcc
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2021 at 10:22 AM > From: "Mark Wielaard" > To: "Jonathan Wakely" > Cc: "GCC Development" > Subject: GCC association with the FSF > > Hi, > > Lets change the subject now that this is about GCC and the FSF. > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:46:29PM +0100, Jonathan Wakel