On 4/1/21 2:35 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The first release candidate for GCC 10.3 is available from
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
>
> and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 4/1/21 2:35 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The first release candidate for GCC 10.3 is available from
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
> > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:56 AM Arthur Gautier
wrote:
>
> Dear GCC development team,
>
> We've been trying to build reproducibly the minimal NixOS image, and
> gcc was one of the last issues we had.
> We found that disabling profiled bootstrap compilation of GCC allowed
> us to get a re
Hello Thomas, Jonathan, David, Nathan Jean and... everybody. :-)
I'm sorry for this long mail that rivals with the original Nathan's
request, but I wanted to back my request properly.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 18:25:23 -0700 Thomas Rodgers wrote:
> Not to argue counter to the observation that there
From what I have seen, problem has really start from developers
who think they are some hot shot that can make things swing their
way. That is the real problem in achieving an inclusive community.
It is not about Richard Stallman at all. He did one of the most
inclusive thing there is, which brut
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 11:06, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> But from outside your "cultural bubble", we all see that a bunch of
> highly controversial [3][4] US corporations (with long term ties with
> the USA DoD [5]) are kicking out of the GCC Steering Committee their
> only connection with both the FSF
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:25 AM Kaylee Blake wrote:
>
> On 7/8/20 10:41 pm, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:42 PM Kaylee Blake wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/5/20 11:49 pm, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:46 PM Kaylee Blake via Binutils
> >>> wrote:
>
> On 19/3/20 12:
Dear Jonathan,
everybody can see it...
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:05:10 +0100 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 at 11:06, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> > But from outside your "cultural bubble", we all see that a bunch of
> > highly controversial [3][4] US corporations (with long term ties
> > wit
> Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2021 at 2:06 AM
> From: "Giacomo Tesio"
> To: "Jonathan Wakely"
> Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" , "Nathan Sidwell"
> Subject: Re: RMS removed from the GCC Steering Committee
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
> everybody can see it...
>
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 14:05:10 +0100 Jonathan Wake
Hi Tadeus,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:07 AM Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
>
> Hi Arthur,
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:56 AM Arthur Gautier
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear GCC development team,
> >
> > We've been trying to build reproducibly the minimal NixOS image, and
> > gcc was one of the last issues we had.
>
Hi,
On Fri, 2021-04-02 at 06:45 -0700, H.J. Lu via Gcc wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 8:25 AM Kaylee Blake wrote:
> > I needed clarification on some of the language in the contract, and with
> > them being so busy that has been taking a while. They've confirmed it's
> > still in their work queu
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:04 PM Arthur Gautier
wrote:
>
> Hi Tadeus,
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:07 AM Tadeus Prastowo
> wrote:
[...]
> > Since an optimized build is likely to be machine-dependent regardless
> > of any intended injection (e.g., different instructions used in GCC
>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:32 PM Tadeus Prastowo wrote:
>
> Hi Arthur,
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:04 PM Arthur Gautier
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tadeus,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:07 AM Tadeus Prastowo
> > wrote:
[...]
>
> By "the manual", do you refer to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.htm
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:06 AM Giacomo Tesio wrote:
>
> I'm sorry for this long mail that rivals with the original Nathan's
> request, but I wanted to back my request properly.
This is free software. If you want to make it better, then make it
better. The EGCS branch that displaced and became G
Snapshot gcc-9-20210402 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20210402/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On 01/04/2021 13:35, Richard Biener wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 10.3 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.3.0-RC-20210401/
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git commit
892024d4af8
Hi Arthur,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:45 PM Arthur Gautier
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:32 PM Tadeus Prastowo
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arthur,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:04 PM Arthur Gautier
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Tadeus,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:07 AM Tadeus Prastowo
>
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> Oh well, sure, but luckily the solution is just as fast and easy as
> it was to remove RMS: pick just one person for each nationality and
> remove the others.
Why nationalities? That strikes me as a rather specific view focusing on
one of many attributes
18 matches
Mail list logo
