Tune cunroll/cunrolli through params

Hi, I'm thinking about to tune the cunroll and cunrolli. And I also had some tests about parameters like: param_max_completely_peel_times, param_max_peel_times, param_max_completely_peeled_insns... During tunning those parameters, I find there are some cases that are improved, while there are alw

Re: Tune cunroll/cunrolli through params

On 10/9/20 10:06 AM, Jiufu Guo wrote: Hi, I'm thinking about to tune the cunroll and cunrolli. And I also had some tests about parameters like: param_max_completely_peel_times, param_max_peel_times, param_max_completely_peeled_insns... During tunning those parameters, I find there are some cases

support in C++2x

Hi being deprecated for nearly 20 years of C++ standards has always been a bit baffling to me. I'm used to thingis being deprecated and then removed a bit faster than that. It is still deprecated in C++17 but does not appear in C++2x as of draft N4860. GCC 10 still behaves the same and you get a

Re: support in C++2x

On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 14:31, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > being deprecated for nearly 20 years of C++ standards has > always been a bit baffling to me. I'm used to thingis being deprecated and > then removed a bit faster than that. > > It is still deprecated in C++17 but does not appear in C++

Re: support in C++2x

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:49 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 14:31, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > being deprecated for nearly 20 years of C++ standards has > > always been a bit baffling to me. I'm used to thingis being deprecated > and > > then removed a bit faster t

Re: support in C++2x

On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 15:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:49 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 14:31, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > >> > Hi >> > >> > being deprecated for nearly 20 years of C++ standards has >> > always been a bit baffling to me. I'm use

Question about interpreting a decl dump

Hi, I am currently trying to get the argument lists for calling intrinsic functions right, and I have run across something in a tree I do not understand. The declaration is: unit-size align:32 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type 0x7feefcfec5e8 pre

Re: Question about interpreting a decl dump

Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote: and the library function has mmaxloc2_4_s1 (gfc_array_s1 * const restrict array, gfc_array_l1 * const restrict mask, GFC_LOGICAL_4 back, gfc_charlen_type len) As far as I can tell, the decl loo

Re: Question about interpreting a decl dump

Hi Iain, If the last node in the list is void_list_node (a TREE_LIST node whose TREE_VALUE is the void_type_ node), then functions of this type do not take variable arguments. Otherwise, they do take a variable number of arguments. > HTH That does help, a lot. It means that this decl is

gcc-9-20201009 is now available

Snapshot gcc-9-20201009 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20201009/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

How to check reachable between blocks

Hi, Is there any API or common codes to check any two blocks is reachable ? Thanks. Jojo

Re: How to check reachable between blocks

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:01 PM Jojo R wrote: > > Hi, > > Is there any API or common codes to check any two blocks is reachable > ? Yes the API in dominance.h. Depending on where you use it, you might need to have it created. Using calculate_dominance_info function. The function to do the

Re: How to check reachable between blocks

Hi, Thanks, i will dig it deeply :) Jojo 在 2020年10月10日 +0800 AM11:14，Andrew Pinski ，写道： > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:01 PM Jojo R wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any API or common codes to check any two blocks is reachable ? > > Yes the API in dominance.h. > Depending on where you use