On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:32 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
>
> I'm having some major grief with a few related things that I'm try to
> do. The mostly revolve around trying to change the type of an SSA name
> (which I've given up in favor of creating new SSA names and replacing
> the ones I wanted
Hello,
We will start analyzing x86_64 regressions reported at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/
to identify commits which caused each regression. For each regression, We
will send an email to the committer, gcc-regression and gcc-patches mailing
lists in following format.
From: suni
Hello,
We will start analyzing x86_64 regressions reported at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-regression/
to identify commits which caused each regression. For each regression, We
will send an email to the committer, gcc-regression and gcc-patches mailing
lists in following format.
From: suni
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 16:31 +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Pip Cet writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 6:18 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > > > The post-reload splitter introduces the clobber. The wiki
> > > > suggests that approach if most insns clobber REG_CC, perhaps because of
> > > > the mi
Richard,
>You need to call update_stmt () if you change SSA operands to
>sth else.
I'm having trouble parsing the "sth else" above. Could you
please rephrase this if it's important to your point. I take
what you mean is if you change any SSA operand to any
statement then update that statement.
T
On August 27, 2020 7:45:15 PM GMT+02:00, Gary Oblock
wrote:
>Richard,
>
>>You need to call update_stmt () if you change SSA operands to
>>sth else.
>
>I'm having trouble parsing the "sth else" above. Could you
>please rephrase this if it's important to your point. I take
>what you mean is if you
I may be missing an obvious workaround, but it seems we currently emit
a #line directive when including lines from machine description files
in C files, but never emit a second directive when switching back to
the generated C file. This makes stepping through the backend in gdb
somewhat painful, be
Snapshot gcc-8-20200827 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200827/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
> If x_2 is a default def then the IL isn't correct in the first place. I doubt
> it is that way, btw. - we have verifiers that would blow up if it would.
Richard,
I'm just sharing this so you can tell me whether or not I'm going
crazy. ;-)
This little function is finding that arr_2 = PHI
is p
