On Jun 25, 2020, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Is there some documentation on how it is implemented on architectures not
> in Ulrich's paper?
Uli's paper pre-dates GNU2 TLS, I'm not sure whether he updated it to
cover it, so https://www.fsfla.org/~lxoliva/writeups/TLS/ might be useful.
--
Alexandre O
Hello,
I have been working on link time optimization for C that may change the
size of structs (at link time). We are close to sharing the results we
have so far, but there are a couple of missing pieces left to work on:
Implementations of sizeof and offsetof that support this change in
stru
Status
==
The GCC 10 branch is in regression and documentation fixing mode.
We're close to two months after the GCC 10.1 release which means
a first bugfix release is about to happen. The plan is to release
mid July and I am targeting for a release candidate mid next
week, no later than Ju
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:56 AM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been working on link time optimization for C that may change the
> size of structs (at link time). We are close to sharing the results we
> have so far, but there are a couple of missing pieces left to work on:
>
> Implement
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:05 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:56 AM Erick Ochoa
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been working on link time optimization for C that may change the
> > size of structs (at link time). We are close to sharing the results we
> > have so far
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:05:20PM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > // source code
> > struct astruct a;
> > memset(a, 0, sizeof(a));
> >
> > // parse time
> > memset(a, 0, 64);
Actually, I don't see the point at all, it doesn't matter if the user
used sizeof(a) or 64 knowing that the stru
@Alexander: May I please remind you this?
Martin
On 6/24/20 10:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/22/20 3:15 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 26, 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/26/20 12:15 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
* contracts.adb, einfo.adb, exp_ch9.adb, sem_ch12.adb,
It'
On 6/27/20 5:33 AM, Shuai Wang via Gcc wrote:
virtual unsigned int execute(function *fun) override
which has no idea about the .C file information. In LLVM all .C files are
roughly maintained in separate "modules" but I just don't know how to
access such information in GIMPLE.
Hey.
Please tak
On 29.06.20 04:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:56 AM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
Hello,
I have been working on link time optimization for C that may change the
size of structs (at link time). We are close to sharing the results we
have so far, but there are a couple of missing
On 29.06.20 04:08, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 1:05 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:56 AM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
Hello,
I have been working on link time optimization for C that may change the
size of structs (at link time). We are close to sharing the r
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> == How do we get what we want? ==
>
> Ideally what we want is to:
>
[...]
> * Disable constant propagation and other optimizations:
>* possibly __attribute__((noipa))
[...]
> == What's the WORST CASE performance of having an unknown sizeof? ==
On 29.06.20 06:05, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
== How do we get what we want? ==
Ideally what we want is to:
[...]
* Disable constant propagation and other optimizations:
* possibly __attribute__((noipa))
[...]
== What's the WORST CASE perfo
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> On 29.06.20 06:05, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 29 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>>> == How do we get what we want? ==
>>>
>>> Ideally what we want is to:
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> * Disable constant propagation and other optimizations:
>>>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> We are not targeting C++ at the moment. What contexts exist in C where we
> require constant expressions? On the top of my head I have array sizes and
> initialization of static variables? In such cases, then yes we agree that we
Bit-field widths, static
Hi,
Did you had a chance to review my previous mail which I sent across
regarding cybersecurity and IT risk management professionals?
If you are interested please drop me a note so that we can connect and
discuss about the opportunity.
Cheers!
Regards,
Emery White
*From:* Emery Whit
Hello,
I am working on a gcc patch for asan. The patch is almost ready except one
thing. To make sure that the user has applied this patch before using asan
feature, I want to declare an additional variable in gcc which is reference
by our source code so that if this patch is missing, the user gets
16 matches
Mail list logo