[RFC] gcov: illogical option names

2020-06-18 Thread Martin Liška
Hey. Historically, I made some illogical changes to options: in GCC 8.x I added: -j, --human-readable - I should have selected likely -H in GCC 9.x I renamed: -i, --intermediate-format to: -i, --json-format So I preserved the short option name for a new intermediate format. But it does not c

Re: Use gcov for line coverage info of GIMPLE code

2020-06-18 Thread Martin Liška
On 6/18/20 4:31 AM, Shuai Wang wrote: Hey Martin, Thanks a lot for the info. I tried to play with __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc but still quite confused on whether it can instrument extra basic blocks introduced by ASAN. Let me present the GIMPLE code for your reference: Probably not. My suggesti

Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Hi, I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and similar in my "git status" output. Could somebody please put .*.swp into .gitignore? I'm sure this would save at least 10 reverts :-) Regards Thomas

Re: Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 19:22, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and > similar in my "git status" output. > > Could somebody please put .*.swp into .gitignore? I'm sure this > would save at least 10 reverts :-) You can just add i

Re: Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 1:34 PM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 19:22, Thomas Koenig via Gcc > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and > > similar in my "git status" output. > > > > Could somebody please put .*.swp into

Re: Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 18/06/2020 19:20, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: Hi, I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and similar in my "git status" output. Could somebody please put .*.swp into .gitignore?  I'm sure this would save at least 10 reverts :-) I have this in my .vimrc to keep such j

Re: Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Am 18.06.20 um 20:34 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc: On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 19:22, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: Hi, I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and similar in my "git status" output. Could somebody please put .*.swp into .gitignore? I'm sure this would save

Re: Please put vim swap files into gitignore

2020-06-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 20:34, Thomas Koenig wrote: > > Am 18.06.20 um 20:34 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 19:22, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I just found a few unversioned files called .intrinsic.c.swp and > >> similar in my "git status" outp

[OMPD] regarding const char **ompd_dll_locations

2020-06-18 Thread y2s1982 . via Gcc
Hello everyone, I would like to share some of my thoughts and seek some opinions on coding for const char **ompd_dll_locations. After reviewing the documentation , looking over LLVM approach

Re: [OMPD] regarding const char **ompd_dll_locations

2020-06-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 05:24:25PM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote: > (LLVM currently simply puts { "ompd.so", NULL }, but I am assuming this was > just a placeholder.) Let's put there { "libgompd" SONAME_SUFFIX (1), NULL } for now. You'll need to change the SONAME_SUFFIX macros though - remove the ()s aro

Re: [OMPD] regarding const char **ompd_dll_locations

2020-06-18 Thread y2s1982 . via Gcc
Hello Jakub, Thank you for the quick response. I assume, then, there's no need for making a function to set this global variable at this point. Should I create a simple unit test that asserts the value to be "libgompd.so.1" for now, or should I skip the unit test on this for now? Cheers, Tony Si

Re: [OMPD] regarding const char **ompd_dll_locations

2020-06-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:19:43PM -0400, y2s1982 . wrote: > Thank you for the quick response. I assume, then, there's no need for > making a function to set this global variable at this point. Should I > create a simple unit test that asserts the value to be "libgompd.so.1" for > now, or should I

gcc-8-20200618 is now available

2020-06-18 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-8-20200618 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200618/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Publishing paid sponsored post on your site

2020-06-18 Thread Swathi Gade via Gcc
Hello, We wanted to reach out to you regarding interest in purchasing guest posts on your site octave.org in the form of content that’s linked with the gambling site. Is this something you would be able to offer? And if so, what would your rate be? Looking forward to hearing from you :) Thank