Hi,
over the course of two years that had passed since the deprecation of the
powerpcspe backend, and a year and a half since its removal from gcc, I've still
been speaking out several times against immediate closing of Bugzilla PRs
against that target[1,2]. IIRC, Andrew has been contemplating a r
Hi!
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 02:58:11AM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> over the course of two years that had passed since the deprecation of the
> powerpcspe backend, and a year and a half since its removal from gcc, I've
> still
> been speaking out several times against immediate closing of Bugzi
Snapshot gcc-9-20200508 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20200508/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
> Hi!
>> But it is clearly obvious that the powerpcspe backend won't be revived. After
>> two years of development, rs6000 has diverged too much from the split point,
>> including LRA adoption.
>
> LRA has been supported by the rs6000 port since 2013 (01b1efaa1439),
> and made the default (and on
Hi!
On 5/9/20 12:15 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> I can do both, if you want, or just the first group? Your choice.
>
> But let's hear other opinions first.
These bugs document the current issues with the backend as it existed
in gcc-8 (or was it -9)? The bugs are still in the removed code, s
