On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not want to start a flame war.
>
> I just am curious what was the reason why
> the old system cannot be used any more?
The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for years.
> Would there be a possibility to get the old look-a
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 05:51, Fangrui Song wrote:
> It is really difficult for a non-subscriber to comment now.
> There are no To: or Cc: fields on Pipermail.
Yes, that's a pain. You can click on the sender's address at the top
of the archived mail (or use
https://gitlab.com/miscripts/miscripts/-/
On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not want to start a flame war.
>>
>> I just am curious what was the reason why
>> the old system cannot be used any more?
>
> The software it ran on hasn't been maintained for year
On 3/25/20 8:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I do not want to start a flame war.
>>>
>>> I just am curious what was the reason why
>>> the old system cannot be used any more?
>>
>> T
> On 3/25/20 8:58 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 3/25/20 8:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 04:48, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
I do not want to start a flame war.
I just am curious what was the reason why
the old system cannot be used any mo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days is
>lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can address
>most
>if not all needs of those involved in GCC development and even has NNT
-On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days
>> is
>> lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can address
>> most
>> if not al
Maybe the best form of question is: Could the Overseer be so kind to
release the dump of the original old mailing list on any free public file
server?
ср, 25 мар. 2020 г. в 21:29, Bernd Edlinger :
> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arsen
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 20:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> >> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these
> >> days is
> >> lore.kernel.org, powered by publi
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:03:15PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> See the link at the bottom of every page in the old archive:
> http://www.mhonarc.org/
>
> > what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer?
>
> It's not packaged for RHEL 8.
It is in EPEL8:
https:/
Hello,
I am an undergrad interested in extending GCC’s static analysis pass for GSoC
2020. In particular, I’m interested in adding C++ support.
The selected project ideas list mentions adding new/delete checking and
exception checking. The features that immediately come to my mind would be
ch
On 3/25/20 9:29 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Could you add a link to https://marc.info/?l=gcc-patches
Why is above link no longer updating
this is the last message there:
1. 2020-03-07 [5] [PATCH] c++: Fix ABI issue with alignas on armv7hl [P
gcc-patch Jason Merrill
is this a push or a pull wh
12 matches
Mail list logo
