On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:31 PM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to find out the arguments of functions which are undefined
> during LTO.
>
> Basically:
>
> gcc_assert(in_lto_p && !cnode->definition)
> // Do we have arguments?
> gcc_assert(DECL_ARGUMENTS(cnode->decl)) // fails
> // No
On 12.03.20 08:48, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am trying to find out the arguments of functions which are undefined
during LTO.
Basically:
gcc_assert(in_lto_p && !cnode->definition)
// Do we have arguments?
gcc_assert(DECL_ARGUMENTS(cnode->decl)) // fails
// No, we don't.
As I und
On 13.03.20 00:44, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:31 PM Erick Ochoa
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to find out the arguments of functions which are undefined
during LTO.
Basically:
gcc_assert(in_lto_p && !cnode->definition)
// Do we have arguments?
gcc_assert(DECL_ARGUMENTS(c
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:32 PM Tamar Christina
wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gcc On Behalf Of Richard Biener
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 11:12 AM
> > To: Kewen.Lin
> > Cc: GCC Development ; Segher Boessenkool
> >
> > Subject: Re: How to extend SLP to support this ca
Hello,
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> +for (tree parm = DECL_ARGUMENTS (undefined_function->decl); parm; parm =
> DECL_CHAIN (parm))
> + {
> + tree type = TREE_TYPE(parm);
> + if (dump_file) fprintf(dump_file, "I want the type, do I have it?
> %s\n", type ? "true" :
It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
in comment #16 on the bug under Martin Liška's name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92071#c16
Similarly, commits r9-8372, r10-7152, and r8-10
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
> made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
> in comment #16 on the bug under Martin Liška's name.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
On 3/13/20 9:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
made by others(*). Fox instance, commit r10-7151 for PR 92071 shows
in comment #16 on the bug under Martin Liška's
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:56:58AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 3/13/20 9:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:46:40AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> > > It looks as though commits with bug fixes appear in Bugzilla comments
> > > made by others(*). Fox instance, comm
Hi, all
I want to propose and apply for the following GSoC project: Automatic
Detection of Parallel Compilation Viability.
https://www.ime.usp.br/~belinass/Automatic_Detection_of_Parallel_Compilation_Viability.pdf
Feedback is welcome :)
Here is a markdown version of it:
**Automatic Detection o
Snapshot gcc-8-20200313 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200313/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 5:11 PM Paul Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 17:15 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > My thinking was to build GCC inside the container, then package up the
> > results and install that on your dev machines (outside a container).
> > But actually that won't work becau
12 matches
Mail list logo
