On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 06:22, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 10:14 PM li zi wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > We are using gcc in our projects and we found some of the C standard
> > functions (like memcpy, strcpy) used in gcc may induce security
> > vulnerablities like buffer overflo
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
Quist and others at the Compiler Explorer project]
On https://godbolt.org/ within the C an
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
> now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
> out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
> Quist and others at
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
Quist and others at the Compiler Explorer proje
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
> > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our bugzilla,
> > even though this is still on a branch? (with me as default
> > assignee)
>
> I think so, we hav
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:11 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> [...]
> > > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our
> > > bugzilla,
> > > even though this is stil
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
> > is
> > now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
> > it
> > out without building it yourself. [Than
On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
it
out without bui
Hi, doesn't actually anybody know know to make memory more expensive
than registers when it comes to allocating registers?
Whatever I am trying for TARGET_MEMORY_MOVE_COST and
TARGET_REGISTER_MOVE_COST, ira-costs.c always makes registers more
expensive than mem and therefore allocates values t
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC
> > > > [1]
> > > > is
On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 17:59 -0500, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is an update on the LTO pass we've been working on. The
> optimization is called ipa-initcall-cp because it propagates constant
> values written to variables with static lifetimes (such as ones
> initialized in initialization
> On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 17:59 -0500, Erick Ochoa wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is an update on the LTO pass we've been working on. The
> > optimization is called ipa-initcall-cp because it propagates constant
> > values written to variables with static lifetimes (such as ones
> > initialized in i
Hello,
I am trying to understand how to store information in object files
during LTO.
Is it possible to write arbitrary data in these sections?
There's not a lot of documentation about the specifics I need in the GCC
Internals.
I have made a simple LTO pass that writes
* "Hello world\n" into an
Hi,
I want to alter some information of an existing Bugzilla tracker, such as
assignee, but found there is no entrance in page of the Bugzilla tracker to do
this. How can I get it?
Thanks,
Feng
14 matches
Mail list logo
