Namaste,
We are importers and stockiest of RWMA Resistance Welding
Electrodes like
COPPER CHROMIUM ZIRCONIUM / CuCrZr / C18150 /CuCr1Zr / CW106C - in Rounds and
Flats
Characteristics: CuCrZr alloy that can be hardened by cold forming and by
precipitation of CuCrZr - phases during a heat treatm
Namaste,
We are importers and stockiest of RWMA Resistance Welding
Electrodes like
COPPER CHROMIUM ZIRCONIUM / CuCrZr / C18150 /CuCr1Zr / CW106C - in Rounds and
Flats
Characteristics: CuCrZr alloy that can be hardened by cold forming and by
precipitation of CuCrZr - phases during a heat treatm
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:50 PM Arslan Khan wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that i insert an extern at source level? Wouldn't
> that decrease the usability of the safe stack drastically? Currently
> all user has to do is provide an address where we intend to place
> shadow stack, but if he has to p
On Thu, May 30 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Interesting, I was also puzzled for a moment. But notice that:
>>
>> int main ()
>> {
>> _Float128 x = 18446744073709551617.5f128;
>> _Float128 y = __builtin_roundf128 (x);
>
Hello.
The f128 suffix worked. Based on all the corrections you all pointed
out, I have created another patch. I think I took most of the things
under consideration but please mention if I missed anything. The
following test cases were inspected with this patch. I am not sure if
the second test cas
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 12:11:18PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Thu, May 30 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> Interesting, I was also puzzled for a moment. But notice that:
> >>
> >> int main ()
> >> {
> >> _Float128 x
On 5/30/19 5:38 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
Interesting, I was also puzzled for a moment. But notice that:
int main ()
{
_Float128 x = 18446744073709551617.5f128;
_Float128 y = __builtin_roundf128 (x);
}
behaves as exp
On 5/31/19, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 5/30/19 5:38 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Interesting, I was also puzzled for a moment. But notice that:
>>>
>>> int main ()
>>> {
>>> _Float128 x = 18446744073709551617.5f128;
>>>
On 5/29/19 9:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:41 PM Jeff Law wrote:
This aspect of symbolics would be handled by a relational/equivalence
processing engine that would be follow on work. Using the same basic
model as ranges, each tree code is taught to understand the rel
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
The above suggests that iff this is done at all it is not in GORI because
those are not conditional
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:26 PM Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:09:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:01 AM Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've been trying to implement an idea Andy suggested recently for
> >
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:43:44PM +0200, Mark Brand wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:26 PM Tycho Andersen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:09:44AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:01 AM Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>> On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>> The above suggests that iff this i
On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
The above suggests t
On 5/31/19 2:26 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
stmt-level tracking of ranges are sometimes important. This is
something the machinery cannot provide - correct? At least not
optimistically enough with rang
Snapshot gcc-8-20190531 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20190531/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-8
On 5/31/19 6:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 2:26 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
stmt-level tracking of ranges are sometimes important. This is
something the machinery cannot provide - correct? At least not
optimistic
17 matches
Mail list logo
