*
[image: No title]
[image: No title]
[http://d-click.hitsmart.com.br/u/34094/181297/17413229/1894050_0/7a606/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bodyglove.com.br%2Floja%2F]
[image: ]
[http://d-click.hitsmart.com.br/u/34094/181297/17413229/1894051_0/7a606/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fproduto.mercad
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 12:29 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > +struct build_id_note {
> > +/* The NHdr. */
> > +uint32_t namesz;
> > +uint32_t descsz;
> > +uint32_t type;
> > +
> > +char name[4]; /* Note name for build-id is "GNU\0" *
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Since the introduction of GNU Property notes this is (sadly) no
> > longer
> > the correct way to iterate through ELF notes. The padding of names
> > and
> > desc might now depend on the alignm
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > Since the introduction of GNU Property notes this is (sadly) no
> > > longer
> > > the correct way to iterate through ELF notes. The padding of n
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Since the introduction of GNU Property notes this is (sadly) no
> > > > longer
> > > > the
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> get_build_id_1 (struct dl_phdr_info *info, size_t, void *data)
> {
Isn't this all a bit silly? We could simply encode the svn revision, or
maybe even just some random bytes generated once in stage1 at build time
as "checksum" and be done with.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > get_build_id_1 (struct dl_phdr_info *info, size_t, void *data)
> > {
>
> Isn't this all a bit silly? We could simply encode the svn revision, or
> maybe even just some random bytes generated o
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 15:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > Since the introduction of GNU Property notes this is (sadly) no
> > > > longer
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 15:36 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > > > Since the introduction
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > That would mean when p_align == 8 the note name isn't 8-aligned
> > > but just 4-aligned? That is, sizeof (Elf*_Nhdr) == 12, and the
> > > name starts right after that instead of being aligned according
> > > to p_align? That sounds o
Test results here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2019-02/msg03095.html
Complete logs can be found here:
https://cloud.emrich-ebersheim.de/index.php/s/g9D245XdCW6GD5W
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
