On Oct 11, 2018, Rich Felker wrote:
> However the only way to omit this path from TLSDESC is
> installing the new TLS to all live threads at dlopen time
Well, one could just as easily drop dynamic TLS altogether, forcing all
TLS into the Static TLS block until it fills up, and failing for good i
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 14:48, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 09/10/18 15:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 14:30, Paul Koning wrote:
> >> I'm trying to build the current code on Linux with GCC 4.3.2 (stock
> >> compiler in Fedora 10 which is my old test system). It fails
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 04:00:32AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2018, Rich Felker wrote:
>
> > However the only way to omit this path from TLSDESC is
> > installing the new TLS to all live threads at dlopen time
>
> Well, one could just as easily drop dynamic TLS altogether, forcin
Hi Jakub,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> If you have regression bugfixes or documentation fixes that should be
> still backported to the branch, please test them and check them in
> before Friday, October 19th
I'd like to push back
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg000
On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Anthony Green wrote:
> I was building a C compiler from a source tree that does not include
> the sources for the fortran front-end. It seems that this is no longer
> supported, and the fortran sources must be available even if you're only
> building C/C++.
>
> I'll stop st
