Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility

2018-02-03 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 23:54 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: > Your problem is probably linked to these issues, if you want to follow > them: > > gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81932 > gdb: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22013 > > As Carl said, it's a good idea to t

GCC mirror - Please read it

2018-02-03 Thread BigSearcher Info
Hello, please let me know if you need the mirror I set for the GCC community some weeks ago. Thank you, Andrea Hi, I set up a new GCC mirror. URL: https://bigsearcher.com/mirrors/gcc/ Update frequency: daily Organization/Contact: BigSearcher (https://bigsearcher.com) / i...@bigsea

Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility

2018-02-03 Thread Roman Popov
I've just checked g++8.0.1 from trunk, and the problem is still there. And same with Clang compiler. This is indeed is a serious issue for me, since my Python scripts for gdb expect reliable dynamic type identification. However gdb is completely powerless here. So I'm forced to stay on older compi

Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility

2018-02-03 Thread Manfred
n4659 17.4 (Type equivalence) p1.3: Two template-ids refer to the same class, function, or variable if ... their corresponding non-type template arguments of integral or enumeration type have identical values ... It looks that for non-type template arguments the template type equivalence is b

Re: gdb 8.x - g++ 7.x compatibility

2018-02-03 Thread Simon Marchi
On 2018-02-03 13:35, Manfred wrote: > n4659 17.4 (Type equivalence) p1.3: > > Two template-ids refer to the same class, function, or variable if > ... > their corresponding non-type template arguments of integral or > enumeration type have identical values > ... > > It looks that for non-type tem