On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 12:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > We have reached zero P1 regressions today (and < 100 important
> > regressions) and the branches/gcc-7-branch has been created;
> > GCC 7.1-rc1 will be buil
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could help me understand a bug involving
> aliasing, this is happening on aarch64 but I don't think it is architecure
> specific. The problem involves flexible arrays vs. zero sized arrays at
> the end of a structur
On 04/25/2017 12:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:08:15PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> On 04/20/2017 12:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> Status
>>> ==
>>>
>>> We have reached zero P1 regressions today (and < 100 important
>>> regressions) and the branches/gcc-7-branch
Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
on FreeBSD. The generated file gcc/options.h contains
code of the form
OPT_C = 116, /* -C */
OPT_CC = 117, /* -CC */
OP
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 06:59 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
> bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
> on FreeBSD. The generated file gcc/options.h contains
> code of the form
>
> OPT_C = 116, /*
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:03 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 06:59 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
>> bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
>> on FreeBSD. The generated file gcc/options.h contains
>> code of
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:03:40AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> >From what I can tell, the n_opts and opts in that file come direct from
> opt-read.awk, which gets them from opt-gather.awk, which appears to
> sort them (but my awk skills are weak).
Perhaps a bug in the FreeBSD awk?
The *.awk fil
On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
> bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
> on FreeBSD.
Did you change your locale since then?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 9
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
> >From what I can tell, the n_opts and opts in that file come direct from
> opt-read.awk, which gets them from opt-gather.awk, which appears to
> sort them (but my awk skills are weak).
Maybe the opt-gather.awk call in Makefile.in needs to set LC_ALL=C.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:09:05AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > From what I can tell, the n_opts and opts in that file come direct from
> > opt-read.awk, which gets them from opt-gather.awk, which appears to
> > sort them (but my awk skills are weak).
> >
> > Alternatively, maybe the colli
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 04:13:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> > >From what I can tell, the n_opts and opts in that file come direct from
> > opt-read.awk, which gets them from opt-gather.awk, which appears to
> > sort them (but my awk skills are wea
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
> > bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
> > on FreeBSD.
>
> Did you change your locale since then?
>
See my re
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > > Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
> > > bootstrap issue) in the last 3 days has broken bootstrap
>
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fixed his
> > > > boot
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:58:56PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fi
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:18:28AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > --- gcc/Makefile.in 2017-04-18 21:16:24.703775156 +0200
> > +++ gcc/Makefile.in 2017-04-25 18:56:58.304963926 +0200
> > @@ -2139,6 +2139,7 @@ s-specs : Makefile
> >
> > optionlist: s-options ; @true
> > s-options: $(ALL_OPT_FILES)
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 12:53 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > int foo() {
> > int i,j;
> > for (i = 0; i < m; i++) {
> > a->o[i] = sizeof(*a);
> > b = ((struct r *)(((char *)a) + a->o[a->n]));
> > for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) {
> > b->slot[j].b = 0;
> in ca
On April 25, 2017 8:03:20 PM GMT+02:00, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 12:53 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> > int foo() {
>> > int i,j;
>> > for (i = 0; i < m; i++) {
>> > a->o[i] = sizeof(*a);
>> > b = ((struct r *)(((char *)a) + a->o[a->n]));
>> > for
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:58:56PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 09:54:04AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 05:46:15PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > On Apr 25 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >
> > > > Someone (other than Richard who seems to have fi
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:43:00PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> This appears to fix my problem. Do you want to commit the patch
> or would you rather have me do it? Note, the problem is present
> in 7-branch. I haven't checked the other branches.
Committed to trunk, 7.x will need to wait until 7
A possibly useful addition similar to:
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
might be
__attribute__((warn_untested_result))
for things like allocation failures that
are not verified before use.
For instance:
void *malloc(size_t size);
could become
void * __attribute((warn_untested_res
The first release candidate for GCC 7.1 is available from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7.0.1-RC-20170425
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision 247264.
I have so far bootstrapped and tested the release candidate on
x86_64-linux and i686-linux. Please test it
Snapshot gcc-5-20170425 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20170425/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
On 04/25/2017 02:35 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
A possibly useful addition similar to:
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
might be
__attribute__((warn_untested_result))
for things like allocation failures that
are not verified before use.
I agree that this would be a useful feature. In fact, I
24 matches
Mail list logo
