Hi,
It's a bit early question, but still.
C++ releases became more predictive and regular.
What do you think about settings -std=c++17 (or gnu++17) for gcc-8 as
default c++ mode?
What is your policy regarding default c++ standards in gcc?
--
Egor Pugin
On Sunday 26 March 2017, Egor Pugin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's a bit early question, but still.
> C++ releases became more predictive and regular.
> What do you think about settings -std=c++17 (or gnu++17) for gcc-8 as
> default c++ mode?
> What is your policy regarding default c++ standards in gcc?
I
Snapshot gcc-7-20170326 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/7-20170326/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 7 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
On 03/25/2017 12:26 AM, Marshall Lee Whittaker wrote:
Hi,
I was looking through the historic archives of gcc at ftp.vim.org and
found a very old version of gcc dating back to 1987. I was wondering if
the below thread still applies?
As in, does anybody happen to have any very old original tapes
On 03/26/2017 11:45 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:27:59AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>>
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
>> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wimplicit-fallthrough"
>
> IMNSHO, the correct fix is to complain loudly to whomever
> added -Wimplicit-fallthrough to
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:45:07PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 03/26/2017 11:45 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:27:59AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> >>
> >> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> >> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wimplicit-fallthrough"
> >
> > IMNSHO, the co
On 2017.03.26 at 19:30 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:45:07PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > On 03/26/2017 11:45 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:27:59AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push
> > >> +#pragma GCC diagno
