Re: [gimplefe] hacking pass manager

2016-07-06 Thread Prasad Ghangal
On 30 June 2016 at 17:10, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Prasad Ghangal > wrote: >> On 29 June 2016 at 22:15, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: On 18 June 2016 at 12:02, Prasad Ghangal wrote: >

Re: [gimplefe] hacking pass manager

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Prasad Ghangal wrote: > On 30 June 2016 at 17:10, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Prasad Ghangal >> wrote: >>> On 29 June 2016 at 22:15, Richard Biener wrote: On June 29, 2016 6:20:29 PM GMT+02:00, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:

Re: [Patch 0,1a] Improving effectiveness and generality of autovectorization using unified representation.

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Sameera Deshpande wrote: > > From: Sameera Deshpande [sameera.deshpa...@imgtec.com] > Sent: 20 June 2016 11:37:58 > To: Richard Biener > Cc: Matthew Fortune; Rich Fuhler; Prachi Godbole; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Jaydeep > Patil > S

Re: [RFC] lto partitioning of varpool_nodes for section anchors

2016-07-06 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> Hi, >> I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (var-partition-1.diff), >> that attempts to partition variables to reduce number of >> external references and to increase us

Re: [RFC] lto partitioning of varpool_nodes for section anchors

2016-07-06 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: > On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (var-partition-1.diff), >>> that attempts to partition vari

Fwd: Re: GCC libatomic questions

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Henderson
Redirecting to the gcc list for discussion. I'll follow up on that thread directly. r~ Forwarded Message Subject:Re: GCC libatomic questions Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:27:20 -0700 From: Bin Fan Organization: Oracle Corporation To: Richard Henderson Hello R

Re: Fwd: Re: GCC libatomic questions

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Henderson
CMPXCHG16B is not always available on 64-bit x86 platforms, so 16-byte naturally aligned atomics are not inlineable. The support functions for such atomics are free to use lock-free implementation if the instruction is available on specific platforms. Except that it is available on almost all 64

question about illegal utf-8 encoding in string literals

2016-07-06 Thread Blower, Melanie
Hello I work for Intel on the Intel C++ compiler and we strive to be compatible with the gnu compiler. We are processing a source file assuming utf-8 encoding and we see a string literal with illegal utf-8 encoding, such as an 8-bit character with the high bit set like 0xa3. Testing shows that g

Re: [RFC] lto partitioning of varpool_nodes for section anchors

2016-07-06 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On 6 July 2016 at 22:25, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >> On 4 July 2016 at 13:51, Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni >>> wrote: Hi, I have attached a "quick and dirty" prototype patch (va

gcc-4.9-20160706 is now available

2016-07-06 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160706 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160706/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches