Hi,
This patch parses simple assignment statement
int a;
void __GIMPLE foo()
{
a = 1;
}
but it does not produce gimple dump. In debugging I found that
cfun->gimple_body is not NULL and it contains GIMPLE_ASSIGN statement.
Am I missing something ?
Thanks,
Prasad Ghangal
On 31 May 2016 at 15
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch parses simple assignment statement
>
> int a;
> void __GIMPLE foo()
> {
> a = 1;
> }
>
> but it does not produce gimple dump. In debugging I found that
> cfun->gimple_body is not NULL and it contains GIMPLE_ASSIGN statem
On 06/03/2016 02:26 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 12:03 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I guess it is a tough decision. If you don't have HW instruction to read
say double word aligned integer atomically, if you don't implement atomic
load on it through compare and swap (which ind
