> >
> > typeinfo seems to be a weak object symbol
> > which is known to be broken with lto, so
> > this may be related to:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69271
This PR is about quite speicfic use of weak symbols, the way weaks are used
in C++ (to unify multiple defintions) sh
Hi,
As David suggested in his rtlfe patch,
this patch recognizes __GIMPLE keyword and switches to
c_parser_parse_gimple_body by providing -fgimple option.
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c b/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
index 4568cf6..41a8f05 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family
I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
being adequately addressed.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
> I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
> being adequately addressed.
But how do you want to address that? His point is that it does not belong
into -Wall, while there seems to be a wide agreement that it
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> I'm sad that this discussion died so soon without Antonio's points
>> being adequately addressed.
>
> But how do you want to address that? His point is that it does not belong
