On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> > You can't simply use
>> >
>> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
>> >
>> > as it can be placed at variable offset which will make
Status
==
The GCC 5 branch is currently open for regression and documentation fixes.
I plan to do a release candidate of GCC 5.4 at the end of next week
followed by a release at the beginning of June.
This is a good time to look through your assigned bugs looking for
patches you might want
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >
> >> > You can't simply use
> >> >
> >> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
On 05/18/2016 05:16 AM, Woon yung Liu wrote:
I didn't know that, thanks.
I've re-done the instructions and expands, mostly based off the stuff that you
shared earlier. Unfortunately, the test function wouldn't compile:
testv.c: In function 'testv8mult':
testv.c:87:1: error: unrecognizable ins
Attached is a patch with some experiments of mine.
On Tue, 10 May 2016 01:17:37 +0200
Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Wishes:
> > - Add stack-usage in output of -fdump-ipa-cgraph, so that you don't need to
> > relate information from two input files at all. I guess this is not
> > trivial. Or is it?
> Under which circumstances are there missing functions in the cgraph?
When the RTL expander calls library routines, there are no traces of them in
the IPA callgraph.
--
Eric Botcazou
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20160518 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20160518/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On 18 May 2016 at 19:38, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > You can't simply use
