On 03/23/2016 10:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/23/2016 07:32 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
int
maximal_insn_latency (rtx insn)
{
int insn_code;
if (insn == 0)
insn_code = DFA__ADVANCE_CYCLE;
else
{
insn_code = dfa_insn_code (as_a (insn));
if (insn_code > DFA
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have attached my gsoc proposal, please review it. Let me know if I
> have missed or misunderstood anything
Please re-word the Abstract, it is really weird to read - I suggest to drop
any notion of RTL or "back end" and somehow me
On 03/24/2016 11:17 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 03/23/2016 10:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
It looks like this block of code is written by a helper function that is
really intended for other purposes than for maximal_insn_latency. Might
be worth changing to
int insn_code = dfa_insn_code (as_a
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/24/2016 11:17 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > On 03/23/2016 10:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > > It looks like this block of code is written by a helper function that is
> > > really intended for other purposes than for maximal_insn_latency. Migh
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 14:31 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have attached my gsoc proposal, please review it. Let me know if
> > I
> > have missed or misunderstood anything
>
> Please re-word the Abstract, it is really we
On March 24, 2016 6:30:29 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm
wrote:
>On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 14:31 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I have attached my gsoc proposal, please review it. Let me know if
>> > I
>> > have missed or m
On 24 March 2016 at 19:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have attached my gsoc proposal, please review it. Let me know if I
>> have missed or misunderstood anything
>
> Please re-word the Abstract, it is really weird to read - I s
(Please CC me as I am not subscribed)
It seems that when building a cross-compiler with a default --target but
no default --with-sysroot, the default -isystem =/usr/include path is
not automatically included when using --sysroot but default -L =/lib and
-L =/usr/lib are included.
(Full example ou
On 25 March 2016 at 01:15, Prasad Ghangal wrote:
> On 24 March 2016 at 19:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Prasad Ghangal
>> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I have attached my gsoc proposal, please review it. Let me know if I
>>> have missed or misunderstood anything
>>
>> P
On 03/24/2016 10:02 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/24/2016 11:17 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 03/23/2016 10:25 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
It looks like this block of code is written by a helper function that is
really intended for other purposes
10 matches
Mail list logo
