to:gcc@gcc.gnu.org
from:Mr.Michio Sudo
I have an trouble in E edit descriptor of gfortran.
This is a example.
(source file: test.f95)
program test
implicit none
real a,b
a=135.0
b=1737.5
write(*,*)a,b
write(*,'(e9.3,a,f7.1)')a,' ',b
write(*,'
I would like to clear some doubts regarding project.
Basic goals in the project will be (please correct me if I am wrong):
1. Developing FE for C like gimple IR - basically by extending or
modifying C FE (I can see most are in favour of not including gimple-C
into c-family languages)
2. And ad
> I have an trouble in E edit descriptor of gfortran.
> This is a example.
> (source file: test.f95)
>program test
>implicit none
>real a,b
>a=135.0
>b=1737.5
>write(*,*)a,b
>write(*,'(e9.3,a,f7.1)')a,' ',b
>write(*,'(1pe9.3,a,f7.1)')a
I think gfortran's result *is* *correct* according to the
Fortran standard.
(I concur that the result is not what one would expect but
it is now decades to late to change that.)
sudo.michio wrote:
> I have an trouble in E edit descriptor of gfortran.
> This is a example.
...
> write(*,'(e
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 02:50, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:12:56PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>> This way, implementing a library that supports dealing with GIMPLE
>>> becomes much simpler. This provides a nice fo
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> wrote:
>> On 9 March 2016 at 02:50, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:12:56PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
This way, implementing a library that supports dealin
Hi all,
I'm hoping to get the opinions from users/devs in general and hope you
can forgive my post.
---
To start I'm really annoyed over the past couple of years for what
claim to be open standards, but in fact are only pay-to-play or just a
facade for corporate agenda.
Things which i
Status
==
GCC trunk is still in regression and documentation fixes stage.
We're now half-way through our usual period of shaking out regressions
before a new release which would be released mid April if we can trust
past years experience.
The number of serious regressions has decreased sign
convert_scalars_to_vector in i386.c calls
calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
Shouldn't it call
free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
after it is done like other places where calculate_dominance_info is used?
When I extend the STV pass to 64-bit and put the 64-bit STV pass before
the CSE
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> convert_scalars_to_vector in i386.c calls
>
> calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>
> Shouldn't it call
>
> free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>
> after it is done like other places where calculate_dominance_info is used?
Only if it inva
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> convert_scalars_to_vector in i386.c calls
>>
>> calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>>
>> Shouldn't it call
>>
>> free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>>
>> after it is done like ot
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> convert_scalars_to_vector in i386.c calls
>>>
>>> calculate_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>>>
>>> Shouldn't it call
>>>
>>> free_do
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
convert_scalars_to_vector in i386.c calls
calculate_dominance_
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:41 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> convert_scalar
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:41 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:16 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Richard Biener
> >>> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:48 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>
> Since convert_scalars_to_vector may add instructions, dominance
> info is no longer up to date.
Adding instructions doesn't change anything on the dominance info, just
cfg manipulations that don
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>>
>> Since convert_scalars_to_vector may add instructions, dominance
>> info is no longer up to date.
>
> Adding instructions doesn't change
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> > free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>>>
>>> Since convert_scalars_to_vector may add instructions, dominance
>>> info is no lo
On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek
>wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
Since convert_sc
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
> > wrote:
> > > On 9 March 2016 at 02:50, Trevor Saunders
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:12:56PM -0500, D
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
>>On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek
>>wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
On 03/10/2016 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu" wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:43:27AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
free_dominance_info (CDI_DO
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek
>>>
>>> wrote:
to:Dr.Dominique d'Humières and Dr.Tobias Burnus
from:Mr.Michio Sudo
Thankyou for your prompt responses.
My research was not enough.
I will use the p edit scriptor as it is.
Best regards.
- Original Message -
>> From: Dominique d'Humières
>> To: sudo.mic...@jaea.go.jp
>> Cc: GCC Developm
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 03/10/2016 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu"
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Thu,
On 03/10/2016 08:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/10/2016 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On March 10, 2016 6:02:58 PM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu"
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:57 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 08:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/10/2016 01:18 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
> On March 10, 2016 6:0
27 matches
Mail list logo
