Is anyone building GCC (and libstdc++ specifically) with uclibc? I haven't
done this in a while and when I do it now I get this build failure:
/scratch/sellcey/repos/uclibc-ng/src/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/random.tcc:
In member function '__gnu_cxx::{anonymous}::uniform_on_sphere_helper<_Dimen
GCC 6, compared to GCC 5, now emits an extra newline between error
messages. Is this intended?
$ cat error.c
int x = a;
int y = b;
$ gcc-5 error.c
error.c:1:9: error: ‘a’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int x = a;
^
error.c:2:9: error: ‘b’ undeclared here (not in a function)
int y
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:33PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> GCC 6, compared to GCC 5, now emits an extra newline between error
> messages. Is this intended?
>
> $ cat error.c
> int x = a;
> int y = b;
> $ gcc-5 error.c
> error.c:1:9: error: ‘a’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> int x =
On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 19:20 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:12:33PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > GCC 6, compared to GCC 5, now emits an extra newline between error
> > messages. Is this intended?
> >
> > $ cat error.c
> > int x = a;
> > int y = b;
> > $ gcc-5 error.c
>
On 12/20/2015 11:39 PM, Cole wrote:
Hi,
I am busy trying to generate a package for gcc that is consistent
between two successive builds, and I am now down to the final few
files.
I am stuck with the file: cilk-abi-cilk-for.o, which is obviously
built with -O2, but between two successive builds,
HI Martin,
Thanks very much for the suggestions as well as all the information
about the qsort issues.
Did you ever publish your changes as a patch, or create a write up
about what was necessary to create a reproducible build? I would be
interested to see what others have done, and potentially an
