On S/390 the test case gcc.dg/loop-9.c currently fails:
void f (double *a)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
a[i] = 18.4242;
}
It seems to expect that moving 18.4242 to a register is moved out
of the loop, but on S/390 it isn't. It turns out that
move_invariant_reg() is
Hi!
I have tried a few things, and got things somewhat working, but I'm not
satisfied with my results so far, so I'd like to ask for help. OpenACC
specifics are not relevant to my question, which I'm thus formulating in
a very generic way. (But find an illustrative example at the end of the
emai
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the Intel386 psABI version 1.1 draft:
>
> https://github.com/hjl-tools/x86-psABI/wiki/intel386-psABI-20151120.pdf
>
> Main changes are
>
> 1. Add AVX-512 support.
> 2. Add linker optimization to combine GOTPLT and GOT slots.
> 3. Ad
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On S/390 the test case gcc.dg/loop-9.c currently fails:
>
> void f (double *a)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> a[i] = 18.4242;
> }
>
> It seems to expect that moving 18.4242 to a register is moved out
> of the loo
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:48:10AM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > On S/390 the test case gcc.dg/loop-9.c currently fails:
> >
> > void f (double *a)
> > {
> > int i;
> > for (i = 0; i < 100; i++)
> > a[i] = 18.4242;
> > }
>
