[1] still says in its third paragraph:
--q--
Important: GCC's support for C++11 is still experimental. Some
features were implemented based on early proposals, and no attempt
will be made to maintain backward compatibility when they are updated
to match the final C++11 standard.
--/q--
[1] https:
On 21 November 2015 at 10:35, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> [1] still says in its third paragraph:
>
> --q--
> Important: GCC's support for C++11 is still experimental. Some
> features were implemented based on early proposals, and no attempt
> will be made to maintain backward compatibility when they are u
On 11/20/2015 3:55 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 11/20/2015 8:14 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/20/2015 04:34 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Isn't that going to break too much code though? I mean, e.g. including
libgcc...
I don't know. My suspicion is very little.
But that's actually what I'd
When implementing interrupt attribute for x86 interrupt handlers, we
have a difficult time to access interrupt data passed down by x86
processors. On x86, interrupt handlers are only called by processors
which push interrupt data onto stack at the address where the normal
return address is. Inter
On 11/19/2015 5:53 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 11/19/2015 06:23 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
About the only immediate task would be to ensure that the
documentation for traditional asms clearly documents the desired
semantics and somehow note that there are known bugs in the
implementation (ie
