I just tried both -Os -fpeel-loops and -Os -frename-registers for a code
I'm trying to compact, and both settings increased code size compared to
-Os.
cheers
simon
On 08/14/2015 11:53 AM, sa...@hederstierna.com wrote:
> I think I found explanation, the -fpeel-loops trigger some extra flags:
>
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 08:38AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On September 20, 2015 1:40:12 AM GMT+02:00, Martin Sebor
> wrote:
> >On 09/19/2015 03:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 11:34AM -0700, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> On Sep 19, 20
On 09/20/2015 12:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On September 20, 2015 1:40:12 AM GMT+02:00, Martin Sebor
wrote:
On 09/19/2015 03:32 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 11:34AM -0700, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Sören Brinkmann
wrote:
H
Snapshot gcc-6-20150920 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20150920/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 12:41 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 11:11 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Oleg Endo
> > wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Kaz and I have been discussing the SH5/SH64 status, which is part
> >> of the SH port, every now and then. To our kno
Hi all,
I was thinking of adding some SH specific builtin functions for the
addc, subc and negc instructions.
Are there any plans to add clang's target independent multiprecision
arithmetic builtins (http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html)
to GCC?
A while ago clang's checked arithm
