[Abe wrote:]
Ideally, I/we fix the above problem -- and the rest of the regressions in the
new if converter --
[Alan wrote:]
OK, what are these regressions?
Each of these files` test cases currently fails to be autovectorized:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr61194.c
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ve
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Abe
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 4:20 AM
>
> [Abe wrote:]
> >> The preceding makes me wonder: has anybody considered adding an
> optimization
> >> profile for GCC, […] that optimizes for the amount of energy
> consumed
All:
>From the description of the definition of the macro
>RETURN_ADDRESS_POINTER_REGNUM , it is derived that this macro is used to
Define a register for the above macro that helps in getting the return address
from the stack or frame pointer.
I could see many of the architectures supported by
