On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
> use shift at higher optimization levels?
That is what I would expect.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote:
> The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The
> corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken:
> GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/)
> also in PDF (/onlinedocs
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Martin Lucina wrote:
> On Thursday, 09.04.2015 at 16:20, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > Why do you not recommend using the vendor component for anything
> > > significant? To me it seems the logical place to say "this is a rumprun
> > > toolchain", plus the result is easier to par
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:51 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
>> use shift at higher optimization levels?
>
> That is what I would expect.
Ok, then I see why thi
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ilya Palachev wrote:
> > In the mentioned README file it is said that " In order to collect this
> > profile, you will need to have an Intel CPU that have last branch record
> > (LBR) support." Is this information obsolete? Chrome Canary builds use
> > AutoFDO for
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Michael Witten wrote:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
> I'm not looking for anything.
>
> That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page
> calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should
> probably be thrown out as superfluous.
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
David
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
> profiling.
>
> David
>
> On Apr 10, 2015 10:39 AM, "Jan Hubicka" wrote:
>>
> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
> profiling.
I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms that
try to guess edge profile from BB profile.
Honza
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Ilya Palachev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some questions about AutoFDO.
>
> On 08.05.2014 02:55, Dehao Chen wrote:
>>
>> We have open-sourced AutoFDO profile toolchain in:
>>
>> https://github.com/google/autofdo
>>
>> For GCC developers, the most important tool is cre
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
>> profiling.
> I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
> on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms that
> t
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Ok, then I see why this doesn't happen: mulsi3 pattern matching is
> conditional on TARGET_MUL32, so when TARGET_MUL32 ==0 and
> expand_simple_binop emits a call to a helper it's not considered
> mulsi3, it's just a call:
>
> (call_insn/u 17 1
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
> > > Like this:
> > >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01086.html
> > >
> > > ODR rears its head again ...
> >
> > huh, why is c/c-lang.h ge
Hello GCC team,
Greetings...
I am new user of Linux. I have RHEL 6.0 installed and want to run C++
on my system but I do not know how.
Please help me or let me know where to contact.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar Aditya
+919015142426
13 matches
Mail list logo