Hi, all.
When I first tried to write a simple plugin for GCC, it turned out that
existing docs on plugins
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Plugins.html#Plugins) are rather
brief, so I had to refer to the GCC source code. When I grepped the
source looking for one of plugin API functions, I fo
Hello All:
I am proposing the new approach to Loop transformation as given below in the
example For the loops with
conditional expression inside the Loops. The Loop body should be reducible
control flow graph. The iteration
space is partitioned into different spaces for which either the cond_exp
> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:22:29 +0300
> From: malts...@gmail.com
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; san...@codesourcery.com
> Subject: Examples of GCC plugins
>
> Hi, all.
>
> When I first tried to write a simple plugin for GCC, it turned out that
> existing docs on
> From: ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com
> To: l...@redhat.com; richard.guent...@gmail.com; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> CC: vin...@xilinx.com; shail...@xilinx.com; vid...@xilinx.com;
> nmek...@xilinx.com
> Subject: Proposal for another approach for Loop transformation
> From: ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com
> To: l...@redhat.com; richard.guent...@gmail.com; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> CC: vin...@xilinx.com; shail...@xilinx.com; vid...@xilinx.com;
> nmek...@xilinx.com
> Subject: Proposal for another approach for Loop transformation
hi,
I'm only commenting on algorithmic stuff at this point, you should make
sure this doesn't regress anything in make check. This stuff only
effects code using omp stuff so compiling random c++ is unlikely to test
this code at all.
Also please follow the style in
https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconve
-Original Message-
From: Aditya K [mailto:hiradi...@msn.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 11:37 AM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; Jeff Law; Richard Biener; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: RE: Proposal for another approach for
