Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC

2015-03-05 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:43:49AM +0530, Sidharth Chaturvedi wrote: > Hi, > > I came across this page while browsing through ideas for GSoc-2015: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ModularGCC > > I like the overall task, but it seems somewhat overambitious. I wanted > to verify if this is still a des

Re: SPIR-V and GCC

2015-03-05 Thread Xerxes Rånby
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 16:20 +, BogDan wrote: > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 5:22 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:36 +, BogDan wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > > > Probably is a little bit too early, but I'd like to ask if there is > > any chance to use gcc to produce SP

[PATCH, committed] jit documentation fixes

2015-03-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 07:37 +0100, Bert Wesarg wrote: > Hi David, > > while reading the very good tutorial at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/intro/tutorial03.html > > I noticed that the calls to gcc_jit_block_end_with_conditional() > misses the on_true and on_false parameters. Good cat

Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC

2015-03-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/04/15 12:13, Sidharth Chaturvedi wrote: Hi, I came across this page while browsing through ideas for GSoc-2015: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ModularGCC I like the overall task, but it seems somewhat overambitious. I wanted to verify if this is still a desirable architectural goal (as the las

Re: SPIR-V and GCC

2015-03-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:27 +0100, Xerxes Rånby wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 16:20 +, BogDan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 4, 2015 5:22 PM, David Malcolm > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:36 +, BogDan wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > Probably is a littl

Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC

2015-03-05 Thread Sidharth Chaturvedi
I like the idea of making the intermediate representations more streamable. But I think this task should also involve creating separate front-end and middle-end modules, as then there can be a clear distinction of what IR is an input to a module and what IR is output from a module(including a more

Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

2015-03-05 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zamyatin, Igor" wrote: Jeff Law wrote: The original plan was for Balaji to take on this role; h

gcc-4.8-20150305 is now available

2015-03-05 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.8-20150305 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20150305/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.8 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

bfin fails to build on 4.9 but builds on head

2015-03-05 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi Anyone happen to know what patch might need to be backported? I didn't see a PR I have filed on this but someone might know. -c ../../../gcc-4.9-branch/libgcc/fp-bit.c -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS ../../../gcc-4.9-branch/libgcc/fp-bit.c: In function '__divsf3': ../../../gcc-4.9-branch/l

Re: Listing a maintainer for libcilkrts, and GCC's Cilk Plus implementation generally?

2015-03-05 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:39:44 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 02/23/15 14:41, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:56:06PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >>> On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:02:30 +, "Zamyatin, Igor" > >>> wrote: > >

Re: GSoc-2015: Modular GCC

2015-03-05 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 12:21:58AM +0530, Sidharth Chaturvedi wrote: > I like the idea of making the intermediate representations more > streamable. But I think this task should also involve creating > separate front-end and middle-end modules, as then there can be a > clear distinction of what IR