Re: LTO problems with -fprofile-generate (aarch64)

2015-02-25 Thread Jan Hubicka
> Hi, > > I have problems compiling xalan as part of spec2006 benchmark for aarch64, > both native and cross. > The issue arises when both -flto and -fprofile-generate are enabled during > LTO. > Compiling with the same flags for x86 has no problem. > Also other projects for aarch64 compile with

Re: need help with Pointer Bounds Checking documentation

2015-02-25 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 02/25/2015 12:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: 2015-02-24 19:47 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore : Poking around, I see that the -fcheck-pointer-bounds and various -fchkp-* options are listed in c-family/c.opt, but they are not listed in the GCC manual. The section on intrinsics is not enough, by itse

Re: need help with Pointer Bounds Checking documentation

2015-02-25 Thread Ilya Enkovich
2015-02-25 19:16 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore : > On 02/25/2015 12:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >> >> 2015-02-24 19:47 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore : >>> >>> >>> Poking around, I see that the -fcheck-pointer-bounds and various -fchkp-* >>> options are listed in c-family/c.opt, but they are not listed in

Re: LTO problems with -fprofile-generate (aarch64)

2015-02-25 Thread Benedikt Huber
Compiling with -flto-partition=none succeeds, however increases compilation time significantly. One interesting thing is that even the failed compile produces an executable that works. Is that normal? Should I really attach the ipa-cgraph dump to the bug report? The file is 945M big, 27M compress

Re: need help with Pointer Bounds Checking documentation

2015-02-25 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 02/25/2015 09:47 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: 2015-02-25 19:16 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore : On 02/25/2015 12:56 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote: 2015-02-24 19:47 GMT+03:00 Sandra Loosemore : Poking around, I see that the -fcheck-pointer-bounds and various -fchkp-* options are listed in c-family/c.op

Re: How to update reg_dead notes

2015-02-25 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Am 02/24/2015 um 07:33 PM schrieb Kenneth Zadeck: when i suggested that you do a build with all of the checking turned on, i wanted you to this without you new code in it.there is a good possibility that the problem is that your port is generating bad rtl. Ah, ok. This actually revealed an

Re: How to update reg_dead notes

2015-02-25 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
it is a good policy to do a run with full checking every once in a while. it is easy to have some garbage sneak in.df is particularly sensitive to bad rtl so that was my first suggestion.i had forgotten that df (as well as a lot of the infrastructure) does not work very late. On 02/25

Announcing Ilya Enkovich as bounded pointer/MPX maintainer and MPX runtime maintainer

2015-02-25 Thread Jeff Law
I'm pleased to announce Ilya Enkovich has been appointed as the maintainer for the generic bounded pointer infrastructure, the MPX implementation of bounded pointers and the MPX runtime for GCC. Ilya, if you could add yourself to the MAINTAINERS file in the additional roles, it would be apprec

Announcing Kirill Yukhin as x86 vector ISA extension maintainer

2015-02-25 Thread Jeff Law
I'm pleased to announce that Kirill Yukhin has been appointed as the maintainer for the vector ISA extensions for the x86 port. Kirill, if you could add yourself to the MAINTAINERS file for the additional role, it would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeff

MPX runtime inclusion for GCC 5

2015-02-25 Thread Jeff Law
So the steering committee has agreed to include the MPX runtime in GCC. The runtime bits are a necessary component to actually make use of the MPX capabilities. GCC is a downstream consumer of the core runtime and the canonical repository for the wrapper subpart of that runtime. The quest

gcc-4.9-20150225 is now available

2015-02-25 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.9-20150225 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.9-20150225/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.9 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: need help with Pointer Bounds Checking documentation

2015-02-25 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> Patch is a part of a series which is waiting for additional steering >> committee approval due to copyright and a license. > I don't imagine the documentation for *features already committed* > needs to wait for steering committee approval; per the G