On Dec 22, 2014, at 9:54 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>
>>> I recently contributed some fixes against GCC trunk, gcc-4_9-branch, and
>>> gcc-4_8-branch for which I need the re
Andrew Haley writes:
> On 12/21/2014 02:38 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> Shouldn't the configure step have made config.h?
>
> It's probably because you are building in srcdir. That is not
> supported.
Hmm, newbies run into this often enough that I wonder whether we should
just error out from the con
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2014, at 9:54 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>
>> On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>>
I recently contributed some fixes against GCC tru
Matt Godbolt writes:
>
> I'll happily file a bug if necessary but I'm not clear in what phase
> the optimization opportunity has been missed.
Please file a bug with a test case. No need to worry about the phase
too much initially, just fill in a reasonable component.
-Andi
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Please file a bug with a test case. No need to worry about the phase
> too much initially, just fill in a reasonable component.
>
Thanks - filed as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64396
-matt
On 12/23/14 09:07, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Andrew Haley writes:
On 12/21/2014 02:38 AM, Bruce Korb wrote:
Shouldn't the configure step have made config.h?
It's probably because you are building in srcdir. That is not
supported.
Hmm, newbies run into this often enough that I wonder whether
>From the svn log, I saw tschwinge did a lot of bug fixing on the
gomp-4_0-branch, and recently merged trunk to gomp-4_0-branch without
mention of any outstanding conflicts. Does this signify an imminent
merge of the gomp-4_0-branch to the trunk?
If so, I am really excited to try out openacc
Als
