On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:48:53PM -0500, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently contributed some fixes against GCC trunk, gcc-4_9-branch, and
> gcc-4_8-branch for which I need the requisite legal paperwork.
>
> However, I'd like to backport these particular fixes to the MacPorts
> Projec
On 24 November 2014 at 10:58, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:48:53PM -0500, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently contributed some fixes against GCC trunk, gcc-4_9-branch, and
>> gcc-4_8-branch for which I need the requisite legal paperwork.
>>
>> However, I'd like t
All:
The optimization of reducing save and restore of the callee and caller saved
register has been the attention Of
increasing the performance of the benchmark. The callee saved registers is
saved at the entry and restore at the
exit of the procedure if the register is reused inside the proced
Ajit,
Please check it out the -fshrink-wrap option.
~Umesh
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
> All:
>
> The optimization of reducing save and restore of the callee and caller saved
> register has been the attention Of
> increasing the performance of the benchmark. Th
On Saturday 2014-08-23 12:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues
> due to the version number change.
>
> One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc
> as we used to create libgcj-4.10.pc.
>
> Shouldn't that be libgcj-
On 11/24/14 09:00, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Saturday 2014-08-23 12:38, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Packaging last week's GCC 5 snapshot, I ran into a couple of issues
due to the version number change.
One is this: We are still creating libdata/pkgconfig/libgcj-5.0.pc
as we used to create libgcj-4.10.
*ping*
Didn’t get any response to my question so far…
>> Thanks everyone for the comments and review.
>> Committed as r217366
>
> I cannot push the change to binutils-gdb as I don’t have write access there.
> Also, Joseph Myers said I needed to commit to newlib/libgloss, but their
> webpage on
Done:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-11/msg00318.html
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:04 AM, FX wrote:
> *ping*
>
> Didn’t get any response to my question so far…
>
>
>>> Thanks everyone for the comments and review.
>>> Committed as r217366
>>
>> I cannot push the change to binutils-gdb as I
> Done:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-11/msg00318.html
Thanks!
