Hello,
I've recently faced an issue I'm afraid I currently unable to debug. When
building an arbitrary version of Linux kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
target, it seems gcc prior to 5 produces a good image which boots just fine, and
current gcc 5 snapshots (4.10.0-alpha20140810 for example)
On 2014.09.09 at 17:35 +0800, Arseny Solokha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've recently faced an issue I'm afraid I currently unable to debug. When
> building an arbitrary version of Linux kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
> target, it seems gcc prior to 5 produces a good image which boots just fine,
On 09/09/2014 10:51 AM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> Attached is an extended version of the patch,
> it brings a 100% improvement in make -j32 -k check-gcc
First of all, many thanks for working on this.
+# ls -1 | ../../../contrib/generate_tcl_patterns.sh 300
"dg.exp=gfortran.dg/"
How does t
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 2:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014.09.09 at 17:35 +0800, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've recently faced an issue I'm afraid I currently unable to debug. When
>> building an arbitrary version of Linux kernel for powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
>> tar
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:02:18PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 10:51 AM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> > Attached is an extended version of the patch,
> > it brings a 100% improvement in make -j32 -k check-gcc
>
> First of all, many thanks for working on this.
>
> +# ls -1 | ../../.
On 18-08-14 14:16, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 06-08-14 17:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
We could insert a pass-group here that only deals with functions that have the
kernels directive, and do the auto-par thing in a pass_oacc_kernels (which
should share the majority of the infrastructure with the parloop
> +# ls -1 | ../../../contrib/generate_tcl_patterns.sh 300
> "dg.exp=gfortran.dg/"
>
> How does this work with subdirectories? Can we replace ls with find?
The input to the script is general, you can use this to your advantage. For
example, I've been using:
ls -1 g++.*/* | cut -c5- | ../../.
> No. As I wrote earlier, splitting on filenames and test counts only is only
> very rough split, all the splits really need to be backed out by real timing
> data from popular targets.
I'm actually doing quite some testing trying to get a reasonable balance,
checking 'completed in' in all *.l
On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 18-08-14 14:16, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > On 06-08-14 17:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > We could insert a pass-group here that only deals with functions that have
> > > the
> > > kernels directive, and do the auto-par thing in a pass_oacc_kernels (which
>
Hi!
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:17:53 +0200, Manuel López-Ibáñez
wrote:
> On 18 August 2014 16:34, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> >> On 08/18/2014 09:42 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 08/16/2014 04:37 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:57:09AM +, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> > No. As I wrote earlier, splitting on filenames and test counts only is only
> > very rough split, all the splits really need to be backed out by real timing
> > data from popular targets.
>
> Furthermore, for parallel perf
> If you get whitespace right, one can provide multiple different wildcards to
> a single *.exp file, e.g.
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp='p[0-9A-Za-qs-z]* pr[9A-Za-z]*'" should
> cover all tests starting with p other than pr[0-8]*.c (where you could split
> say pr[0-2]* into another job, pr
On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
error-prone
(not undoable of course but
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> >I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
> >it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
>
> I'd second this. Writing patterns manually
On 09/09/2014 06:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
I'd s
Now with gzipped figure.. why do these bounce ?
> But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't
> make sense to split them off as separate job. I think we don't need 100%
> even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable.
Let me add some data, attached is a gr
Attached is a further revision of the patch, now dealing with check-c++.
Roughly 50% speedup here at '-j32' (18m vs 12m). For my setup
(--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran) I have now improved all targets called in
'make -j32 -k check'. The latter is now 30% faster (15m vs 20m). Note that
there ar
Dear GNU developers,
I don't know if this is the right place to signal this, but I believe
this Android application
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.maclab.codepad2
Especially with this plugin
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.maclab.codepadgcc
violates the GPL l
Makrus, Andrew, thanks for your suggestions.
>> On Sep 9, 2014, at 2:57 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014.09.09 at 17:35 +0800, Arseny Solokha wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've recently faced an issue I'm afraid I currently unable to debug. When
>>> building an arbitrary version o
On 09/09/14 09:46, Paolo Inaudi wrote:
Dear GNU developers,
I don't know if this is the right place to signal this, but I believe
this Android application
[ ... ]
The right place is license-violat...@gnu.org. The FSF actually owns the
copyright on GCC.
You can find further information on how
Thank you very much for the pointer, and sorry for my mistake.
Paolo
Il 09/09/2014 18:46, Jeff Law ha scritto:
On 09/09/14 09:46, Paolo Inaudi wrote:
Dear GNU developers,
I don't know if this is the right place to signal this, but I believe
this Android application
[ ... ]
The right place is li
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
> # Get newlib and the simulator
> cvs -d :pserver:anon...@sourceware.org:/cvs/src co newlib sim
> # Get binutils
> git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
>
> # Create the combined tree
> rm -rf combined
> mkd
> On 09/03/14 02:35, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >>Last time I tried, there are several passes after loop_done and before
> >>auto-inc-dec can't handle auto-increment addressing mode, including
> >>fweb.
> >
> >It surprises me that pass_web can't han
It is indeed caused by wrong DF information, which is caused by a
wrong fix for bug PR32339.
More discussion is at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63156.
thanks a lot
Guozhi Wei
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On 09/03/14 02:35, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> >On We
24 matches
Mail list logo
